What is the main reason you switched to LED
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I disagree, RGB LEDs do what metal halide and t5 do, and then some. Look at any comparison graph, and the spectrums can be matched 100%.I have run the numbers and for most people i cant see that it is a huge cost savings. If you replace a 250w halide with a 125w led you save 50% on the operation of the light. But upfront costs are higher. The leds are not full spectrum even the rgb ones so you have to supplement which adds more cost.
For my real world analysis the savings of switching from my 3x250 with 4-96w pc's would be around 35-40 a month. But upfront cost of 3 radion and some t5 supplements would be around 2500$. Assuming no further andvancements to make these new leds obsolete if you divide the cost over five years then the radions are 450$ per year plus operating costs (radions after not even a year already have upgrades available not factored into this cost)
I know i am not taking into account the heat factor. Lucky for me its not a huge problem for my situation.
While i love the glow of leds for most people who claim the monthly bill as the reason the math does not work if you depreciate the cost over the five years.
Im not saying leds are not good. I love them, but the reason to switch for most people should not be the electric bill.
I have owned leds and when i upgraded tanks i sold them and went with halide because the initial cost of halides was lower for me.
I disagree, RGB LEDs do what metal halide and t5 do, and then some. Look at any comparison graph, and the spectrums can be matched 100%.
Electricity costs where you live are a huge factor. I was paying 50cents a K/w here in California. My power bill was over $500 most months. I replaced 500w of lighting with 100w of LEDs on just one of my tanks and I get more output from the LEDs. My power bill went from $500 down to $80 after switching out all my display lights (multiple tanks). To top that off, I paid over $700 for my MH/T5 lighting, I paid under $400 for my LED light, so it was almost 1/2 the cost for LEDs vs my old lighting.I have run the numbers and for most people i cant see that it is a huge cost savings. If you replace a 250w halide with a 125w led you save 50% on the operation of the light. But upfront costs are higher. The leds are not full spectrum even the rgb ones so you have to supplement which adds more cost.
For my real world analysis the savings of switching from my 3x250 with 4-96w pc's would be around 35-40 a month. But upfront cost of 3 radion and some t5 supplements would be around 2500$. Assuming no further andvancements to make these new leds obsolete if you divide the cost over five years then the radions are 450$ per year plus operating costs (radions after not even a year already have upgrades available not factored into this cost)
I know i am not taking into account the heat factor. Lucky for me its not a huge problem for my situation.
While i love the glow of leds for most people who claim the monthly bill as the reason the math does not work if you depreciate the cost over the five years.
Im not saying leds are not good. I love them, but the reason to switch for most people should not be the electric bill.
I have owned leds and when i upgraded tanks i sold them and went with halide because the initial cost of halides was lower for me.


