curiously its not that expensive anymore.Given that I think Lights are by far the most costly part of a beginner set up
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
curiously its not that expensive anymore.Given that I think Lights are by far the most costly part of a beginner set up
I think it depends on what you want to keep and the quality of build. But YES seems to be coming down all the timecuriously its not that expensive anymore.
I don't want to get in the whole debate about "which light is best" because A: that's been done a lot, and B: this is not the thread for it...curiously its not that expensive anymore.
SBreeflight. 1500 par at 12in will grow just about anything. 140 and up. A mars aqua is not too shabby either. $89 will also do close to 1500 par.I think it depends on what you want to keep and the quality of build. But YES seems to be coming down all the time
I looked at those, and I can't remember why I looked away! I need to start writing stuff down when I read it so that I'll never forget anything.SBreeflight. 1500 par at 12in will grow just about anything. 140 and up. A mars aqua is not too shabby either. $89 will also do close to 1500 par.

oh but that price is quite important. It used to be the single most expensive thing. that price drop right there I think made the hobby more accessible than any other so far.I don't want to get in the whole debate about "which light is best" because A: that's been done a lot, and B: this is not the thread for it...
In fact that should be the biggest consideration. 2 QT's maybe 3. 1 coral 2 fish? ugly to spend money on real needs.It's been said in a few different ways, but if you have the budget for a $4,000 tank you can build a tank that's a heck of a lot bigger than 55g for $4,000. And it's not like a 100 gallon tank that cost $4,000 is going to be somehow inferior to a 55g tank at $4,000. Heck, you could go a lot bigger (a lot) than 100g and still kill it with equipment. On the other hand, to stock a 55g with corals will be a lot less expensive than a 100g, depending on what you're trying to accomplish.
I read most of this thread, but I'd like to offer another possible plan for you. It's sorta what I did, but I didn't have $4,000 to get started. Maybe consider spending $1,000 on a smaller tank first. You could then later use this tank for a QT, a frag tank, or a specimen tank of some sort. Then you'll have a real feeling of what is worth how much money, if that makes sense. Because a $4,000 tank is $4,000, but experience is priceless.
That's the approach I'm trying to take, too.Did it need to be that much.
No!!
but I figured buy the best and not want to upgrade and end up spending more when I did decide to upgrade.
Plus did my research to see what was working for everyone. Also warranty and customer service of who's equipment your buying.
I don't want to buy some cheaper stuff and wish I went with better stuff.I do agree that lighting is important. I just didn't want the thread topic to shift from "how much did your reef tank cost" to "what light do I need in order to grow SPS?"oh but that price is quite important. It used to be the single most expensive thing. that price drop right there I think made the hobby more accessible than any other so far.
you dont need a skimmer, you don't need a reactor or gfo, you dont need a sump. You do need light.
So I think its pretty valid.
I do agree that the plan you offered is a good plan, but I don't think I can do it easily. If it were up to me, I'd definitely consider it, but I probably mentioned somewhere in this thread's replies that I'm a kid with no personal income -- I have no job or even an allowance. On the bright side, the lack of allowance means my family sort of shares money.It's been said in a few different ways, but if you have the budget for a $4,000 tank you can build a tank that's a heck of a lot bigger than 55g for $4,000. And it's not like a 100 gallon tank that cost $4,000 is going to be somehow inferior to a 55g tank at $4,000. Heck, you could go a lot bigger (a lot) than 100g and still kill it with equipment. On the other hand, to stock a 55g with corals will be a lot less expensive than a 100g, depending on what you're trying to accomplish.
I read most of this thread, but I'd like to offer another possible plan for you. It's sorta what I did, but I didn't have $4,000 to get started. Maybe consider spending $1,000 on a smaller tank first. You could then later use this tank for a QT, a frag tank, or a specimen tank of some sort. Then you'll have a real feeling of what is worth how much money, if that makes sense. Because a $4,000 tank is $4,000, but experience is priceless.

Since I'm new to reefing I don't know what is TRULY considered high-end, but from what I've read, basically all the equipment I'm getting (including the tank itself) is pretty high-end. I'm trying to get the best equipment so that I don't have anything bad happen. As I stated somewhere else, when a risk involves a large glass box filled with many gallons of water and many living creatures, which all costs thousands of dollars, it's probably a risk I don't want to take.A standard 55 is a bad tank shape/ size for a reef. But I think you should be able to do it for significantly less that $3000- I haven't spent that much on a $180 and that includes all corals and fish with medium to high end equipment, apex, etc
I agree that cost of used equipment varies.It seems with more responses your budget is a sound one. There are some cheaper and some more expensive posts so overall good job picking a decent number. Costs seems to add up a lot especially if you track every single receipt. Thought I do think you might be better with a 75 for it being a wider and not much more $$ equipment wise.
One thing some people forget is used equipment varies drastically depending on where you are located. In Iowa you do not see used reef equipment frequently. The Des Moines metro has around 650,000 people and this was the CL listings today for reef aquarium (reef tank, coral all had fewer hits):
![]()
This is an excellent point...I spent the first 7 months doing bi-weekly trips to fill my 5 gallon buckets at the store and was spending more money doing that, than if I just got an RO/DI right from the start.Not sure if anyone has said this yet but a good RO/DI should be part of your startup budget too. That'll save you alot of headaches down the road
I will add a little more. I think your budget is to high. I think you can get a bigger tank and set up for $2000. But this is just my opinion. Also my Craigslist mention was for empty tank.I am getting back in as well after about eight years. I picked up a 90 gallon glass over-flow already installed. Stand and canopy were included for $450, vs using my old 55 gallon. I picked up a thirty gallon tank to build my sump. hardware to plum it, silicone for sump walls, etc... another hundred. New $65 Marine DC DSC-3000 for the return. using an old Oceanic Plus Series 6 protien skimmer to get back in. I have 50# of live rock that is dormant. once my levels are in acceptable range; I will add live stock. so it will cost about $1000. you have options to keep cost down. I am going cheaper on lights and before I add live stock I will upgrade to good LED's. then will upgrade my protein skimmer. you can do it all at once or do it slow. just don't add live stock until it's all dialed in.

