If a fish dies a fish dies. What difference does it make where it came from? You talk about goldfish and guppies. How much does a fish have to cost For their life to be worth something?
It has nothing to do with cost, or even individual fish. It's about the health of the wild reef. I eat fish, and I eat other animals. My position here is not based on the death of the fish. It's based on the detrimental collection and shipping practices.
To be clear, I see farmed fish as any other livestock. Worthy of respect as a living thing, but expendable as livestock. What makes captive bred clownfish any different from tilapia?
It's about protecting the worlds oceans and reefs.
I agree with the rest but I’m intrigued at this, what about other factors;
- Shipping stress
- Potential issues gained during shipping (Mouth issues for example).
Surely a wild caught fish has the same chances of a CB fish with death? Just there’s more wild caught fish that are brought in, resulting in more deaths.
Before leaving the fish farm, the farmed fish are (in theory) at peak health, well fed, prepared for shipping in a clean controlled facility, and then driven to an airport where they are shipped to the door of a customer.
When a fish is collected in the south pacific, it has an unknown parasite load. it's kept on a holding tank on a boat (not always a 1 day trip). Then it goes to an island holding facility. It is shipped to LA where it's pooled with other stressed hungry fish with unknown parasite loads, them to the LFS, then to me. There are so many opportunities along the way for fish to die.
I really don't think this is a numbers game. I think a higher percentage of wild fish die. Jay mentioned having done studies that demonstrate, if I'm not mistaken.
Not so sure how much the rest matters (company politics etc.). Shipping practices maybe.
Idk how much the rest matters, but the original point of this thread was to discuss the treatment of ORA employees. It does matter to me that employees are treated well. I think they will do a better job when they are happy and I think it's also a decent way to run a company.
I, for one, am happy to see
@Biota_Marine here, because as a consumer, I do want them to know that we care about our fish, but also about the people who farm them. If I knew a company treated employees badly, I would be less likely to buy their products.
There's another aspect to this: I've talked to a number of sellers, and they can't move captive-bred fish with cosmetic flaws.
Honestly, this is a big factor in captive breeding of any kind. Breeders cull livestock to maintain product quality. In the absence of selective pressure and with higher chances of in-breeding, it's nessecary. I think this is an important step for many reasons, but keep in mind, that culls are not impacting the wild reef. It's tilapia at that point. A sad reality, but honestly pretty important to keep in check if we want the captive bred market to grow. $250 for a yellow tang is one thing, but $250 for a fish that's not in good form is another. When culls make it into the market, they hurt the marketability of other captive bred fish by building a sentiment in the hobby that captive bred fish are not as good as wild fish.