- Joined
- Sep 20, 2013
- Messages
- 1,074
- Reaction score
- 1,154
Just a theory here, but I can conceive a mechanism where the time of day, and how far into the lighting cycle things are, could matter for tests like NO3, CO3 and pH is a given.
Intense lighting fuels micro fauna metabolic activities. These consume CO2 and raise the pH. This is certain. Tanks with lots of zooxanthellae and other algae may see an impact on NO3 and CO3.
These effects may be offset in some systems by CO2 reactors, algal scrubbers, refugium, dosing and other countermeasures employed by reef keepers. This is especially true if employed with timers to deliberately balance out the diurnal cycle.
One last consideration is the accuracy of our tests. The variations corresponding to when in the lighting cycle you sample and test may be too small for hobby grade tests to accurately pick up unless the system is kept very constant and a lot of sample data is generated and statistically analyzed (e.g. t-test).
To spot real trends, I would recommend testing at the same time of day. This removes lighting cycle as a factor.
Intense lighting fuels micro fauna metabolic activities. These consume CO2 and raise the pH. This is certain. Tanks with lots of zooxanthellae and other algae may see an impact on NO3 and CO3.
These effects may be offset in some systems by CO2 reactors, algal scrubbers, refugium, dosing and other countermeasures employed by reef keepers. This is especially true if employed with timers to deliberately balance out the diurnal cycle.
One last consideration is the accuracy of our tests. The variations corresponding to when in the lighting cycle you sample and test may be too small for hobby grade tests to accurately pick up unless the system is kept very constant and a lot of sample data is generated and statistically analyzed (e.g. t-test).
To spot real trends, I would recommend testing at the same time of day. This removes lighting cycle as a factor.

