What you have probably looks a little like this:
That's already pretty good coverage....adding even one more might give you the overall light density you're looking for.
If you really think you're looking for double the intensity, then upgrading to Hydra26's probably makes sense.
I'd say to get that $12 lux meter. Measure the lights as-is and see what you get for a peak. Then
crowd your 4 Prime's together as if there 5 or 6 in the row instead of 4 and take a new peak measurement.
You would generally want those to be more like 4-5 inches off the surface...you get a boatload of reflection from
inside the tank that way. At 12" you lose almost all the reflection. The N model would help.
Ideally, at around 4" from the water they should look roughly like this:
At 12" off the water (three times higher) a significant portion of the 360's light isn't even hitting the tank, it's lighting the room. You can see the difference this "wasted light" makes in the lack of reflected light in the tank compared to the above example:
Great information, the weekend I was talking to my wife. We need to do some repairs in the house and that includes having to move the place tank.
To do this would take advantage of the repair of the furniture that is somewhat damaged, the idea would be to make a new tank in which to divide two rooms of the house, to do this would take to change the height of the current tank and make it lower thus 63x21x24 (long x high x width).
I think that this would get my Prime to reach the bottom of the tank more intensely, the width would not affect me because only the center of the tank would be the aquascape.
What do you think of this solution and so I do not have to invest in new lights to look for more coverage in the bottom of the tank?
See I'm not the only one!