Why arnt we using skimmers like this?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cory
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users None

Cory

More than 25 years reefing
View Badges
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
6,882
Reaction score
3,137
Location
Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
This skimmer is designed for ponds
protein Skimmer in use.jpg
down skimmer.jpg
 
Looks like bio ball type gas exchange which, IIRC, has something to do with aerobic bacteria or something being undesireable in saltwater. Someone might know more but I know its discussed in a BRS video. Skimmers don't have media surface for bacteria filtration to grow.

But probably more importantly, that looks LOUD.

water.jpg
 
Probably but think of this. Theres no ball valve to adjust, and the foam head has less gravity to fight so its removed easier.

Probably the worst thing is cleaning it.
 
Probably but think of this. Theres no ball valve to adjust, and the foam head has less gravity to fight so its removed easier.

Probably the worst thing is cleaning it.
......and the smell.......the skimmate is not contained at all. Although I guess it would be easy enough to rectify that.
 
Also another benefit is no needle wheel to break or airline to get plugged. Also it shouldnt overflow.
 
Looking at the diagram more, it is basically a freshwater rendition of a Downdraft skimmer. Like the ones we had from now defunct ETSS. Notice that the foam cup is much higher than the foam output of the freshwater version. That is because saltwater makes much more foam. So now that we have established that there are skimmers with this basic design in the hobby, you need to ask why the company that made them went out of business.

Downdraft%20skimmer%202.jpg
skimmer2.jpg
 
Looking at the diagram more, it is basically a freshwater rendition of a Downdraft skimmer. Like the ones we had from now defunct ETSS. Notice that the foam cup is much higher than the foam output of the freshwater version. That is because saltwater makes much more foam. So now that we have established that there are skimmers with this basic design in the hobby, you need to ask why the company that made them went out of business.

Downdraft%20skimmer%202.jpg
skimmer2.jpg

Yes exactly. Id expect they went out of business because they required a powerful pump. Or bad advertising.

Id still expect that having a cup up top is a poorer desighn than having the drain at the bottom. The pond skimmer would need to be adapted slightly for reef i agree. Those etss skimmers worked very well.
 
Etss skimmer. Whos skimmer makes dark foam like that?

skim5c.jpg
 
I have a fiend who has an old ETSS that he won't part with. His only complaint is that the bio-balls in the column get cemented together with carbonates and need periodic de-cementing with vinegar or another acid.
 
The air/water interface behaves differently for saltwater vs freshwater. If you take a skimmer designed for saltwater it won’t do anything in freshwater. The pond design is optimized for freshwater and likely would not work in saltwater.

What you said.

In a pond, they depend on TDS/waste to make up for the effect that salt in saltwater has on water to make skimming work.

(Protein skimming/foam fractionation is not unique to saltwater or even to fishkeeping.)
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top