Why does limewater have a maximum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cory
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users None

Cory

More than 25 years reefing
View Badges
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
6,882
Reaction score
3,137
Location
Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
When dosing calcium hydroxide, why is it that eventually reefers need to dose other things? I understand that ph raises to high, but couldn't you just use a more powerful skimmer to compensate?
 
Mostly due to the solubility limit of the calcium hydroxide. Since the limewater has an upper limit of potency at some point you will be dosing more limewater than your tank evaporates.
 
Okay. Couldn't i just slowly dose dry calcium hydroxide powder to the tank?
 
No, it has to be dissolved in freshwater. If added directly to saltwater calcium hydroxide precipitates calcium carbonate immediately.
 
Mostly due to the solubility limit of the calcium hydroxide. Since the limewater has an upper limit of potency at some point you will be dosing more limewater than your tank evaporates.
pH is the only reason there is a limit to how much calcium can be added to a system with calcium hydrixide. pH increases much faster than the calcium increase. To get around this, calcium salts that do not contain hydroxide are used instead, e.g., calcium chloride.
 
There's a thread on using carbonated water to reduce pH so you can dose more kalk:
IMO, it feels a little "mad scientist," but seems like it works.
 
Bump maybe ill get lucky!
 
There's a thread on using carbonated water to reduce pH so you can dose more kalk:
IMO, it feels a little "mad scientist," but seems like it works.

IMO, that is not a useful thread.
 
Bump maybe ill get lucky!

Some folks do use a slurry of calcium hydroxide in water.

My concerns are that the local high pH as it dissolves may lead to calcium carbonate precipitation, possibly even coating the particles and preventing further dissolution, and the potential for very high pH particulates to land on organisms before they fully dissolve.
 
Some folks do use a slurry of calcium hydroxide in water.

My concerns are that the local high pH as it dissolves may lead to calcium carbonate precipitation, possibly even coating the particles and preventing further dissolution, and the potential for very high pH particulates to land on organisms before they fully dissolve.
Thank you! Ill try and dose a slurry if the demand ever demands it. Into the skimmer id think.
 
No, it has to be dissolved in freshwater. If added directly to saltwater calcium hydroxide precipitates calcium carbonate immediately.
Not entirely true. Calcium Hydroxide doesn't care if it's pre dissolved in water or not. The reaction is the same.

When I add calcium hydroxide in low utilization tanks in place of alk/calcium I pull some tank water in a juice jar, mix in the dry calcium hydroxide, shake it, and dump it back it in the tank. There is a temporary cloudiness but it clears fast. If you have a kalk stirrer in a top off it's the *exact* same thing.

You can also use a lot more kalk in holding solution for top off as long as you use a stirrer. Your limitation here is going to be limited to how much kalk your tank can absorb based on size / C02 levels before the precipitation starts forming on pumps. At that point you know you are using too much.

You do not want to just dump dry calcium hydroxide straight in a tank because clumps may drop on corals and it will burn them. However, mixing it dry first like I do works just as well.

If you use kalk strictly for top off and adjust calcium and alk via other means then you likely don't care. you are just using the kalk as a pH boost.
 
So is it bad to add dry mix directly to the tank chemstry wise?

If it precipitates to calcium carbonate, wouldn't that be okay just not getting as potent a dose sort of?
 
So is it bad to add dry mix directly to the tank chemstry wise?

If it precipitates to calcium carbonate, wouldn't that be okay just not getting as potent a dose sort of?

Yes. That main concern aside from wasting it is the possible irritation of organisms from undissolved particulates.

But folks do use slurries. At one point, IIRC, Anthony Calfo used it.
 
Yes. That main concern aside from wasting it is the possible irritation of organisms from undissolved particulates.

But folks do use slurries. At one point, IIRC, Anthony Calfo used it.
Thanks that clarifies it. Any problem dosing directly into a beckett skimmer? Im thinking it would mix it well there. Or maybe down the overflow.
 
Thanks that clarifies it. Any problem dosing directly into a beckett skimmer? Im thinking it would mix it well there. Or maybe down the overflow.

The local high pH may lead to precipitation on the inside of the skimmer.

Might be easier to dose sodium hydroxide and calcium chloride, without concern about particulates.
 
The local high pH may lead to precipitation on the inside of the skimmer.

Might be easier to dose sodium hydroxide and calcium chloride, without concern about particulates.
Why did you recommend sodium hydroxide instead of sodium bicarbonate two part? Ph boost? Oh is it because they are added separately so there is less concern about calcium carbonate precipitation?
 
Why did you recommend sodium hydroxide instead of sodium bicarbonate two part? Ph boost? Oh is it because they are added separately so there is less concern about calcium carbonate precipitation?

Yes, pH boost.

IMO, it is a better plan than dosing particulate Ca(OH)2, but not better than dissolved Ca(OH)2, assuming the dissolved material meets your needs.
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top