Been looking into salt, I keep reading lower alkalinity is preferred in a salt, can someone please explain why this is the case? as I thought corals used alkalinity so the more the better?
I've been pondering this question also and was thinking of starting a thread when I ran across yours (good timing, eh?).
After reading the responses, I haven't seen one that resembles a convincing argument as to why "lower" alkalinity is preferred. In the first place, I think there should be a clear definition of what is meant by lower.
In my case, I am considering two salt options - Tropic Marin pro and Tropic Marin classic. What's the difference between the two? Let's look at the manufacturer's specs.
- Classic: approx. 9-10° KH, calcium approx. 380 ppm, magnesium approx. 1260 ppm
- Pro: approx. 7° KH, calcium approx. 440 ppm, magnesium approx. 1350 ppm
The conventional wisdom seems to be that the pro variety is preferred for reef tanks. That's what the BRS guys push and seems to be what many of the Tropic Marin users are using (based on a poll I saw here on R2R recently). Looking at the manufacturer's specs, we can see that the pro variety has more calcium and magnesium yet is lower in alkalinity.
If memory serves, it is difficult to produce a salt that is high in alkalinity as well as calcium and magnesium. Its like a seasaw between alkalinity and calcium as to the maximum amount you can keep in solution. If you try to elevate either or both too much, you get precipitation. Maybe someone who knows a lick about chemistry can keep me honest on this and perhaps elaborate.
If you keep stony corals, you are always concerned about calcium and mindful about magnesium. For these reasons, a salt that has "elevated" calcium and magnesium would seem superior. With that said, you still need to keep an eye out for alkalinity.
This is the "theory" as I understand it. Now, let's talk about "in real life". BRS ran some tests on salts. The numbers they showed is that Tropic Marin pro mixed with around 420ppm calcium and 7dkh. Tropic Marin classic mixed with around 410ppm calcium and 8-9 dkh. I'm working off of memory so I might be off a tad. Based on the real life numbers that BRS shared, I have no flipping idea why Tropic Marin pro is supposedly better. Is it because of 10ppm difference in calcium? I posed this same question to someone at BRS. The answer was every bit as unconvincing as the ones you have gotten on your thread.
So back to where I started - I have the exact same question as you - why is a salt with lower dkh supposedly better than one that has higher dkh? To phrase the question more precisely, let me add, "assuming all else is relatively equal."
The others posting on this thread about how you need to use salt that is close to what your target parameters are ... they are right but they are answering an entirely different question altogether.
One last bit - all this "keep your alkalinity low" business seems strange to me. Tropic Marin pro is a "johnny come lately" salt. Hobbyists have been using Tropic Marin classic with its "elevated" alkalinity for decades to keep the most beautiful reef tanks.