Why not 1 week of copper QT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KGV
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users None

KGV

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 9, 2021
Messages
252
Reaction score
120
Location
Belgium
What state or country do you live in
Other International
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am sure this is wrong but I forgot the reason. This was my line of thought: Ich stays on the fish for only a couple of days and then falls off to form a cyst. In addition, copper kills any free floating forms of the parasite so re-infection in copper shouldn't be possible. If so, why not keep fish for one week in copper QT and then transfer to a clean tank? Why is that not sufficient?

Cheers!
 
Are you trying to minimize copper exposure to fish?
No, reducing the time spent on my QT tank. Right now, I do the recommended 1 month of chelated copper and 2 weeks of copper-less observation.
 
No, reducing the time spent on my QT tank. Right now, I do the recommended 1 month of chelated copper and 2 weeks of copper-less observation.

Might I recommend TTM.

 
No, reducing the time spent on my QT tank. Right now, I do the recommended 1 month of chelated copper and 2 weeks of copper-less observation.
The tomont, resting stage can remain viable for 45+ days. Copper only kills the theront stage, so that’s why 30 days is typical. Why rush quarantine? You can still enjoy your new fish while they are there(grin).
Jay
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top