- Joined
- Feb 19, 2018
- Messages
- 3,224
- Reaction score
- 4,835
- Location
- down under
- What state or country do you live in
- Other International
dkhDoesn’t the Hanna Alkalinity checker give a reading in ppm
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
dkhDoesn’t the Hanna Alkalinity checker give a reading in ppm
I must have an old one then... it gives me a reading of say 128 I then have to divide that number by 0.056 to get a dkh of 7.2
Well Mortie there are three to choose from, & Hanna can't make up their mindI must have an old one then... it gives me a reading of say 128 I then have to divide that number by 0.056 to get a dkh of 7.2

But two others that are measured regularly, cal 420ppm & magnesium 1250ppm to 1350ppm![]()
Tbh it doesn’t matter to me as long as my measurements are stable...Well Mortie there are three to choose from, & Hanna can't make up their mind![]()
yes, I feel that for aquarium purposes its simpler, & it only needs to be simple. The proposition seems slighting annoying for the pros though?Meq/L and mmol/L are the only other ways you hear these 2 represented, and as a non-scientist "imperialist" it seems to awkward.

Every other measurement is reported as ppm.
NH3/4
NO2
NO3
PO4
Calcium
Magnesium
Potassium
etc
Only alkalinity is reported in two other ways, meq/L & dKH.
130ppm to 200ppm. Easy
Yes, but deciding on just one unit of measurement & sticking to it is my point.In this hobby, the average aquarist has no use for these numbers beyond ensuring that the ones they obtain with their test kits are within certain ranges. The units are irrelevant.
Doesn’t the Hanna Alkalinity checker give a reading in ppm
For those interested, I compare and discuss nearly all of the units of measure that reefers use here:
The Units of Measure of Reefkeeping by Randy Holmes-Farley - Reefkeeping.com
http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2005-08/rhf/index.php
here's the mentioned entry for ppm calcium carbonate equivalents, which actually is used as a unit for alkalinity (Steve wants this) calcium, magnesium, and total hardness.
ppm calcium carbonate equivalents
ppm calcium carbonate (CaCO3) equivalents is an ambiguous unit used for a variety of measures by reef aquarists, including alkalinity, calcium, magnesium and total hardness. In the case of alkalinity and calcium, the unit refers to the amount (in ppm) of calcium carbonate that would have to dissolve into pure water to give the same calcium concentration or alkalinity (even if that would be impossible to accomplish). For calcium, 1000 ppm calcium carbonate equivalents equals 400 ppm calcium ion. For alkalinity, 100 ppm calcium carbonate equivalents equals 2 meq/L or 5.6 dKH. In the case of magnesium, the concentration refers to the amount of calcium carbonate that would have to dissolve to provide the same number of calcium ions as magnesium ions are present. For magnesium, 1000 ppm calcium carbonate equivalents equals 243 ppm magnesium ion. In the case of total hardness, the unit refers to the amount of calcium carbonate that would have to dissolve to provide the same number of calcium ions as the total of calcium and magnesium in solution. Using ppm calcium carbonate equivalents for magnesium and total hardness is poor practice as they are hard for most aquarists to understand, but they are used for historical reasons by certain testing companies (e.g., Hach, Figure 3). A calculator for converting between different alkalinity units is online here. A calculator for determining how much of different supplements to add to boost alkalinity, as well as calcium and magnesium, is online here.
Alkalinity is just a measurement of the level of bicarbonate & carbonate ions & the waters buffering capacity. The ratio of bicarb to carb ions is determined by pH. At 8.3 it it's totally bicarbonate. But it's the measuring system used to show its level I'm interested in here, & why we don't just all use the simplest one, ppm?
You lost me at “At 8.3 it it's totally bicarbonate” how how does the relationship change as you increase or decrease from 8.3?
yes, I feel that for aquarium purposes its simpler, & it only needs to be simple. The proposition seems slighting annoying for the pros though?![]()
That last link doesn’t work
1. As I said, "simpler" because everything else is reported this way, even salinity is in pptSeriously, why is ppm for alk "simpler" than meq/l? What is preferable about it?
.
. . get out the calculator again to convert to the stated standard to the one I recognise ;Bookworm ;Blackeye ,,,, (nah, too much effort)
It can be done here at R2R. We have the power. We could start by making fun of others who don't conform to the selected standard. ;JawdropI think it does. Click the actual link (which is why I post it). The name of the article gets messed up with your old cookies and may not link properly.
That link works fine for me.https://my.xfinity.com/~jdieck1/chem_calc3.html Says sorry we cannot find this page, it has moved. "homecast" redirects me to this link.

