Anything from Eric is old, but that doesn't mean it is wrong. Lots of my stuff is even older. lol
Yes, it falls into the "it works for me", but it also perhaps shows a disconnect between keeping a great reef tank that most hobbyists would be proud of vs a focus on biochemical phenomena that may actually not be something that most reefers care about.
I don't know if those papers apply to any given reef aquarium scenario, but if they do, do you care if photosynthesis and skeletogenesis are slower that they might be in some other reefkeeping scenario?
If you do, then perhaps focusing on ALL of the things that maximize photosynthesis and skeletal growth may be well worth the effort. High pH, high alk, high light, nutrient levels, calcium levels, etc. Some folks do that. Many do not. Such factors may be much more important to a coral farmer than to a reefer with a tank in his living room, where other factors, such as color, cost, ease of maintenance, etc may be more important.
FWIW, I'm certainly not making a claim that nitrate is unimportant, nor that high nitrate may not do what is claimed in some of those papers. That said, I don't think I'm ignoring any factual reality when I say that keeping a great reef tank does not require a low nitrate level, and to say otherwise may, in fact, be ignoring the reality of tanks like Richard's.