You said you read the article I posted?
An excerpt from the article-
"I have heard many knowledgeable aquarists incorrectly state that all “zoanthids” contain it and are therefore dangerous, which is not accurate whatsoever. Such blanket statements show a lack of expertise in these corals and the extensive research recently published on them. One such study (Deeds et al 2011) focused on aquarium specimens and found that there is likely a single lineage of button polyps which is truly dangerous to the general aquarium community."
Ill agree there isn't enough scientific research done yet at this point.
However, the statement "all zoanthus sp have palytoxin" is false, even some collected specimens of Palythoa sp have been shown to be completely devoid of palytoxin, there was a study -specimens of several species of both Palythoa and zoanthus were collected and these tissue samples were analyzed for the presence of deoxy-palytoxin (PLTX) specimens of P. toxica and P. heliodiscus showed substantial amounts of the compound, whereas like I mentioned P. mutuki samples showed none present.
They did find a compound in a sample of Z. sociatus that looked similar in structure to PLTX, however it was in such trace amounts that they were unable to confirm it was indeed palytoxin.
I will say that I whole heartlly recommend that precautions should be taken with every coral, zoa/paly aside, treat every coral you wont with like it possibly could be harmful if ingested, because some that haven't been fully studied very well could contain potentially harmful compounds.
Better safe than sorry