I'd use separate drivers on the same 0-10V dimmer. A larger driver powering two bars turns into a cluster if one of the bars dies. It'll get too much current (voltage in a parallel circuit remains constant, but current divides). Your new driver would be sized for the two-bar load. If one bar is disconnected, the single bar gets all the juice.
(Note I'm pretty sure you know this soo for others)
You can add a fuse on each bar rated at greater than 1/2 the constant current output.
That 1/2 is for 2 bars with new 2x current driver.
2 bars that want 500mA each.. 1A constant current driver and 2 say 750mA fast blow fuses.
Blown fuse is the good bar btw.
>1/3 for 3 bars ect..
More bars the less worry about 1 dying.
Say you ran 10 bars each using 500mA of current.You need a 5A constant current driver driver.
5/10 = .5A each
One dies you get 5A spread to 9 bars. 550mA/bar
2 bars die 625mA each for the rest..(8 x .625 = 5A)
Should be within tolerance.
Of course if you use like 550mA fuses .. 9 will blow..
All bars wired in parallel to the power supply of course.
Fuses in line of course.
(NEED to add the "gotcha" here.. not all strings behave the same way. Sharing current directly from the driver
can cause bar output anomalies, i.e some dimmer than others due to not "perfectly" dividing the current..
thus the current balancing circuits)
Pretty "hacky" way of doing it though.
Point is it isn't straightforward w/ constant current type bars.. It is w/ constant voltage types though.
No company would do this obviously.
Easier to just mount a Meanwell Ldd-H to each bar and add a DC constant voltage power supply.
Problem is you now are stuck w/ 5V PWM not an "apex direct" dim channel.
There are 10v analog to 5V pwm converter boards of course.
There are current balancing circuits to replace fuses that make this much more elegant.
Need one that also protects the remaining bars, sharing and protection are 2 different things.
Believe even an IC that does it as well.
Point is the usual.. Simple question, complicated answer.