Alk and light issues

Screenshot_20170709-190733.png

This is my updated graph. 10hrs blue and purple,6 hrs 5 percent whites
 
So after reading the course of events. Id have to say your corals stripped the tank entirely of nutrients including no3 and po4. That as well as the lighting issues compounded into destroying your sps as well as wreaking havoc on your inverts. I only find issues above 13 dkh with my tank but thats just sps most lps will tolerate the higher alk so long as nutrients are thru the roof.
 
Have you checked out this video? There seems to be a relationship between high flow, high alkalinity, and higher nutrient levels. I have no first hand experience with this; I have higher flow (roughly 40x/hr in my tank) but my alkalinity is roughly 8.25 (until yesterday) with nutrient levels that are, uh, low'ish (NO3 2.5-5 and PO4 .05). Everything seems to be doing well at these levels but I just recently went SPS dominant (last two weeks).

Great video!!!!
 
Calcium and magnesium could be a little higher. But your KH is good. SG is a little low, 1.026 or 35 ppm is target. If you maintain these levels, you should have success keeping corals.
 
As the salinity increases the KH will as well.
Prob not much, but with high alk low nutrints may be an issue.
 
The zero po4 is low as well in comparison to the 2.5 no3. System is looooowwwww on nutrients. I dont test mine but id wager a guess at 10 times yours... and with my alk at 10.3 things are growing like weeds not great color but growth is thru the roof. I get a quarter inch of height growth on my Noae per cpl of months.
 
Calcium and magnesium could be a little higher. But your KH is good. SG is a little low, 1.026 or 35 ppm is target. If you maintain these levels, you should have success keeping corals.
U honestly think .002 less would be a problem? If he keeps it constantly at .024 I don't think he won't have success.
 
U honestly think .002 less would be a problem? If he keeps it constantly at .024 I don't think he won't have success.

Nope not at all, 1.024 "stable" is good. The point is his "stability", his overall stability will lead to his success. Hope this clears this up.
 
Nope not at all, 1.024 "stable" is good. The point is his "stability", his overall stability will lead to his success. Hope this clears this up.
Ok I was just wondering I prolly read it wrong all good

We are all just trying to help the op and I think the right people are here to do that.
 
I guess the weeks of skipped wc helped bring things into spec. A little low on mg and ca, but i must have starved the tank if nutrients are that low... its been two weeks. I only have one fish left and it gets fed just until its belly is fat then i stop.
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top