Interesting observation on the article Randy... .. I believe I will try the simple approach first and start dosing the tank... right now i have not added a lot of sps back into my DT..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I did experience the problem first hand with my aquarium, with vodka, vinegar and biopellets. When the dose reached the point where NO3 and PO4 were reduced STN started to show from the base up followed by RTN. I tried direct carbon dosing four times until I gave up. I explained this problem to Julian Sprung when he visited the Island in April 2016. He introduce me to the work of Dr. Rohwer. Although he knows the experiment was not oriented to the aquarium trade or under normal aquarium conditions he believed there could be a connection, "important ones" as he mentioned in his email, linking the work of Forest Rohwer and carbon dosing in aquariums. Anyways, you have always been a skeptic with the work of others. I invite you to run your own controlled experiment with all the methodology you understand are correct and enlighten us with your findings.I accept that there is a reasonable hypothesis that organic carbon dosing could cause coral issues in a reef tank, and accept that folks might reasonably choose to not do or do it remotely out of fear for causing growth of problematic bacteria (that was my fear when folks first started suggesting it years ago).
But that said, those data (at least in the above posted article) do not convince me. In that experiment, the corals were placed alone in an aquarium with sugars dosed (huge dose, no nutrient monitoring after organic dosing) . There is literally no other bacteria or surfaces for the bacteria to grow on except what comes in on the coral (at least they mention none). It seems a highly skewed experiment, but I agree that it shows the theoretical possibility.
That said, what is the real risk? Do people see RTN when dosing vinegar or vodka (not sugars) to a real reef tank? I've really not noticed much of a correlation between the incidence of organic carbon dosing and RTN (compared to not using organic carbon dosing and having RTN).
Both RTN and organic carbon dosing are reasonably common in reef tanks. Has anyone notice a substantial correlation that goes beyond what one would expect for two common things to occur together compared to apart?
I did experience the problem first hand with my aquarium, with vodka, vinegar and biopellets. When the dose reached the point where NO3 and PO4 was reduced STN started to show from the base up followed by RTN. I tried direct carbon dosing four times until I gave up. I explained this problem to Julian Sprung when he visited the Island in April 2016. He introduce me to the work of Dr. Rohwer. Although he knows the experiment was not oriented to the aquarium trade or under normal aquarium conditions he believed there could be a connection, "important ones" as he mentioned in his email, linking the work of Forest Rohwer and carbon dosing in aquariums. Anyways, you have always been a skeptic with the work of others. I invite you to run your own controlled experiment with all the methodology you understand are correct and enlighten us with your findings.
Dude, that was very rude. @Randy Holmes-Farley contributes to tons of topics, written many articles on advancedaquarists.com and other sites, helps reefers many times more than anyone else on reef2reef, he is entitled to his own opinion as you are yours. No reason to challenge him and call him a skeptic.I did experience the problem first hand with my aquarium, with vodka, vinegar and biopellets. When the dose reached the point where NO3 and PO4 were reduced STN started to show from the base up followed by RTN. I tried direct carbon dosing four times until I gave up. I explained this problem to Julian Sprung when he visited the Island in April 2016. He introduce me to the work of Dr. Rohwer. Although he knows the experiment was not oriented to the aquarium trade or under normal aquarium conditions he believed there could be a connection, "important ones" as he mentioned in his email, linking the work of Forest Rohwer and carbon dosing in aquariums. Anyways, you have always been a skeptic with the work of others. I invite you to run your own controlled experiment with all the methodology you understand are correct and enlighten us with your findings.
Dude, that was very rude. @Randy Holmes-Farley contributes to tons of topics, written many articles on advancedaquarists.com and other sites, helps reefers many times more than anyone else on reef2reef, he is entitled to his own opinion as you are yours. No reason to challenge him and call him a skeptic.
I built a box like this in the early 90's. It worked great as long as I had the tank. On a 120 gallon tank. With only a wet dry filter and protein skimmer. Hardly ever did water changes.ok. So I have large system. 600 gallon plus. In the past used DSB in my 300 gallon sump to control nitrate. I trashed it and got 14 Marine pure bio blocks and along wit hmy live rocks to control nitrate. Well the blocks been in low flow are not denting the nitrate. I was planning on perhaps putting the blocks in a container so only tops of them get flow..
Another thought is to install a large 6 inch round by 4 foot tube full of bio media. And allow tank wAter to pass through. The end of the tube would lack oxygen for nitrate conversion to gas with possible feed for some vodka or vinegar Addition to feed bacteria.
Other thought. Is to take some of the blocks and use that media in the reactor. Fabricate some type of square media reactor to house let's say five of these blocks and feed it.
Thoughts. Please. Question also. If the blocks in the sump are only creating nitrate. A nitrate factor like in the days of bio balls in a drip plate, The will anyreactor be able to handle the nitrate. ...?

