Anthony the impact of non digital test kit readings on the hobby can't be understated.
We can easily search out kit comparison threads for nitrate where no fw/sw status is in question: the readouts range 100 ppm in some threads. I'm wanting to see how your tests respond across the spectrum of readouts.
Randy just wrote a new post recently on impacts of test misreading, for twenty years I've watched stalled cycle umpires in threads respond to every nh4 reading unquestioned: your bacteria aren't working do steps 1, 2 3 to restore them. Test readings are rarely challenged or verified.
What good does non digital parameter testing really do in the end, if simply purchasing another name brand gets you a 25-100 ppm accuracy spread
Are test kit owners here feeling assured of their readings, having never benchmarked on calibrated digital gear? How do they know their non digital reading is correct
I guess when the new digital nitrate checker gets in Anthony, you should mix up a known solution of nitrate off an
Amazon order and verify the meter accuracy. Test kit skeptics won't believe it without that step.
Myself: I'd never bother measuring or responding to nitrate in a reef tank mine is kept clean enough all current nitrate is fine regardless of status. It's a param I'll never care to measure, that we're spending all this effort hashing for accuracy.
It's easy to just focus on strong suspended feed diversity, heavy export and low waste storage for the system and never own a nitrate test kit while growing so much coral sometimes you have to throw it away to make room for new growth. In the end that's what you're wanting, not the tinkering with various kits.