- Joined
- Nov 18, 2012
- Messages
- 38,516
- Reaction score
- 67,449
- Location
- Fontana, California
- What state or country do you live in
- California
Super cool! @Tahoe61
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is there not a valve available that is either normally open or normally closed where when power is applied it energizes motor open or closed and when not it does opposite. That way your not using two spots on controller..?
usually a automatic valve has a spring return to it's a rest state. Some do not, but the majority do. They way I read the schematic, this valve should be closed when no power is being supplied to the positioner. It looks to me like a relay through one spot on the controller would work. I'm not familiar with this particular valve, but most of what I work with operates that way.Is there not a valve available that is either normally open or normally closed where when power is applied it energizes motor open or closed and when not it does opposite. That way your not using two spots on controller..?
Be sure to post a thread when you do! I work in the SoCal aerospace market, automation is gaining ground in several areas. My other thought was to use something like this in place of a check valve, programmed to close when power failed. On a battery backup system this would be much more reliable if the system needed to stop drainage from display to sump.Automation is my field. I'm going to try this myself when I get my tank setup. I'll try using relays signaled from apex to control the automatic valves. It "should" work very similar to programming a plc from what I've seen so far.
Is there not a valve available that is either normally open or normally closed where when power is applied it energizes motor open or closed and when not it does opposite. That way your not using two spots on controller..?
Indeed there is a valve available with spring back option, however, I like the control of leaving a valve in either position. I feel this is the primary benefit of a motorized valve. A solenoid on the other hand should be NO or NC.Us
usually a automatic valve has a spring return to it's a rest state. Some do not, but the majority do. They way I read the schematic, this valve should be closed when no power is being supplied to the positioner. It looks to me like a relay through one spot on the controller would work. I'm not familiar with this particular valve, but most of what I work with operates that way.
This specific valve is designed for acidic liquids, saltwater shouldn't cause any damage. In the case it does in years to come, the entire ball valve assembly is rebuildable. In this case I won't have to buy a new valve, just internal parts.Are you worried with what salt water might do to the valve

This is a great idea! I have a solenoid to control my filling of the RODI tank based on float switches in the tank. Using a solenoid for Washing the membrane before and after is a good idea, I might need to order another solenoid!I'm planning something similar but a series of 1/4" valves for RODI tubing.
I could find 3 way valves in 1/4, so it's it's a series of relays that will bypass various portions of the RODI system to rinse the membrane before and after the water is made.
It will be triggered by water level sensors in the storage containers.
When the container is empty it will start the process and when it is full it will stop it.
Can you explain a little further? What would activate the relay if not for an outlet?AirWaterIce sells a decent quality 1/4" push fit 110vac solenoid. I've had excellent results with them.
If you were to wire an spdt relay into that circuit, you could eliminate the need for one controlled outlet, run that valve from a single virtual switch, Open/Close.
Could you suggest a wiring schematic for utilizing a relay? I didn't feel my wiring was the most efficient, however, my background is not in electrical engineering.Us
usually a automatic valve has a spring return to it's a rest state. Some do not, but the majority do. They way I read the schematic, this valve should be closed when no power is being supplied to the positioner. It looks to me like a relay through one spot on the controller would work. I'm not familiar with this particular valve, but most of what I work with operates that way.
Can you explain a little further? What would activate the relay if not for an outlet?
Ha! This makes perfect sense! Not only will this free up an outlet, it will also simplify the Apex programming somewhat!A SPDT (Single Pole Double Throw) relay... when energized, pole A is closed, pole B is open. When not, pole A is open, pole B is closed. So... from your controlled outlet (or better yet, a DC relay output... some controllers have one or more available) to the relay energize circuit. From a standard (always on) outlet to the relay circuit, from pole A to the 'open' circuit on your valve, from pole B to your 'close' circuit. That way, your 'always on' outlet is powering either the 'open' or 'close' circuit of your valve, depending on the switched outlet or DC relay output on the controller. Once fully open, or fully closed, the valve itself should break the circuit, based on an internal limit switch.
The only thing you'd really be saving is one controlled outlet. In my system, as I'm sure in many, controlled outlets are at a premium... we've got lots of stuff we want to control, and only a certain number of controlled outlets.
Also prevents you from making a mistake on that Apex, and energizing both OPEN and CLOSE sides of the valve at the same time... that could be badHa! This makes perfect sense! Not only will this free up an outlet, it will also simplify the Apex programming somewhat!

This is exactly my thought. Currently the outlets are programmed with a 3 second delay to keep one from coming on before the other goes off. Relay is ordered, now to find a proper project box for this little addition...Also prevents you from making a mistake on that Apex, and energizing both OPEN and CLOSE sides of the valve at the same time... that could be bad
Glad it made sense...
Be sure to post a thread when you do! I work in the SoCal aerospace market, automation is gaining ground in several areas. My other thought was to use something like this in place of a check valve, programmed to close when power failed. On a battery backup system this would be much more reliable if the system needed to stop drainage from display to sump.
Indeed there is a valve available with spring back option, however, I like the control of leaving a valve in either position. I feel this is the primary benefit of a motorized valve. A solenoid on the other hand should be NO or NC.
This specific valve is designed for acidic liquids, saltwater shouldn't cause any damage. In the case it does in years to come, the entire ball valve assembly is rebuildable. In this case I won't have to buy a new valve, just internal parts.

