Discussion: Would You Rather 0 N or 0 P

Which Would You Rather?


  • Total voters
    45
The point I’m making is that one could bottom both nutrients out and then possibly by overfeeding constantly keep it in suspension as it’s processed. According to Tropic Marin, corals might need phosphates fed directly vs being soluble.
There is an excessive amount of research on how corals uptake inorganic phosphate directly.

Supplement vendors advice on what supplements are needed should not be heeded. Their job is to sell you things.
 
There is an excessive amount of research on how corals uptake inorganic phosphate directly.

Supplement vendors advice on what supplements are needed should not be heeded. Their job is to sell you things.
Directly though consuming detritus or other means?

I’m aware they are selling me. Mentioned that earlier and why I’m questioning why bother with supplements if poop all we need along with why we might not be as concerned with it as many believe is needed.

Been testing the affect of not removing detritus for a year. No corals except for a lone Xenia and my results show detritus accumulation isn’t a concern. I’ll get around to testing it on corals.
 
Last edited:
Have had roughly 0-0.5 ppm NO3 and 0.1-0.3 ppm PO4 for months because I just feed dry coral foods and couldn't be bothered to correct the issue.

Corals were growing fine, colors just weren't all that great, zoas were a little bit slow in growth but still healthy.

Slowly correcting that now with aminos and dosing nitrate, but again, nothing died because of this.

When I had 0 po4 a long time ago on the other hand, coral health took a sharp dive downwards.
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top