- Joined
- Nov 20, 2019
- Messages
- 67
- Reaction score
- 70
- What state or country do you live in
- Wisconsin
As more and more bottle bacteria and critter kits become available, it seems like the debate of live rock vs dry rock starts is still pretty torn down the middle.
The most reasonable answer seems to be: "What are you willing to live with?"
For live rock:
The microfauna simply can not be matched. The bacteria and microbial life present on ocean farmed rock such as TBS is immensely beneficial and many attribute the long term stability of their tank to just that - diversity. Not to mention the bloom of extra visible life that comes with the rock. However, no one can guarantee against pest hitch hikers, which prove to be the main argument against live rock, be it vermetid snails, mantis shrimp (which happened to kill dozens of fish in my first tank until i baked all my rock), bristle worms, ect.
For dry rock:
Complete control of your system is attractive to many, especially those with patience and those who have dealt with a significant pest problem before. Bottle bacteria provides a very real alternative to starting the cycling of the tank, and many simply don't care that it takes longer or if they deal with algae issues along the way. After 6 months to a year, many full dry start tanks look similar to live rock tanks from a distance. Up close however, many feel that there simply is not the same "life" as there is with live rock.
The question I'd like to ask is:
What are the risks of starting a new tank with 100% dry rock in the display, and some live rock from TBS in the sump?
Firstly, will this effectively seed the display? Do we know how much microfauna leaves the rock and becomes waterborne vs how much needs to be physically touching another rock to spread? Will things like sponges, featherdusters, and coral hitch hikers be able to reproduce in the display without ever leaving the sump?
And secondly, how effective would this be for keeping out pests? I'm sure nuisance algae would spread to the display, but that is easily dealt with. The main concern seems to be predators like bristle worms, vermetid snails, and mantis shrimp. How likely is it that these critters (or their eggs) could make it past a sponge block filter and through the return pump successfully infecting the display?
After the research I've done so far, this is the direction i'm leaning. It seems to present the most gain while mitigating MOST of the risk, but at the end of the day I'm just assuming. What do you all think?
Thanks to everyone for reading my rant, and to those who have knowledge in this area (especially facts or experience with this method), I would love your advice.
The most reasonable answer seems to be: "What are you willing to live with?"
For live rock:
The microfauna simply can not be matched. The bacteria and microbial life present on ocean farmed rock such as TBS is immensely beneficial and many attribute the long term stability of their tank to just that - diversity. Not to mention the bloom of extra visible life that comes with the rock. However, no one can guarantee against pest hitch hikers, which prove to be the main argument against live rock, be it vermetid snails, mantis shrimp (which happened to kill dozens of fish in my first tank until i baked all my rock), bristle worms, ect.
For dry rock:
Complete control of your system is attractive to many, especially those with patience and those who have dealt with a significant pest problem before. Bottle bacteria provides a very real alternative to starting the cycling of the tank, and many simply don't care that it takes longer or if they deal with algae issues along the way. After 6 months to a year, many full dry start tanks look similar to live rock tanks from a distance. Up close however, many feel that there simply is not the same "life" as there is with live rock.
The question I'd like to ask is:
What are the risks of starting a new tank with 100% dry rock in the display, and some live rock from TBS in the sump?
Firstly, will this effectively seed the display? Do we know how much microfauna leaves the rock and becomes waterborne vs how much needs to be physically touching another rock to spread? Will things like sponges, featherdusters, and coral hitch hikers be able to reproduce in the display without ever leaving the sump?
And secondly, how effective would this be for keeping out pests? I'm sure nuisance algae would spread to the display, but that is easily dealt with. The main concern seems to be predators like bristle worms, vermetid snails, and mantis shrimp. How likely is it that these critters (or their eggs) could make it past a sponge block filter and through the return pump successfully infecting the display?
After the research I've done so far, this is the direction i'm leaning. It seems to present the most gain while mitigating MOST of the risk, but at the end of the day I'm just assuming. What do you all think?
Thanks to everyone for reading my rant, and to those who have knowledge in this area (especially facts or experience with this method), I would love your advice.

