Hanna Checkers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Frop
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users None

Frop

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 7, 2016
Messages
1,256
Reaction score
1,065
Location
California
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I was thinking about buying a couple of these. Which one do you guys use, and is it the high range / low range model?
 
I love the phosphorous. you like the alk? I hear hit or miss on it and the ca.
Alk has always been spot on for me. I've never used the calcium but have heard mixed things about it.
 
Phosphate low range or Phosphorus meter and Alkalinity are best ones. Salifert for everything else.

What's the difference between Phosphate and Phosphorus?

I was possibly thinking of getting a meter for phosphate, nitrate, and maybe copper if it works for the QT. Mainly because I hate the API test its too hard to read. ;p
 
What's the difference between Phosphate and Phosphorus?

I was possibly thinking of getting a meter for phosphate, nitrate, and maybe copper if it works for the QT. Mainly because I hate the API test its too hard to read. ;p
PO4 low range would be 0.00ppm where as phosphorus would be 0.000ppm
 
You would have to convert the points per billion to points per million. But it gives a more accurate reading.
 
The alkalinity has always been very consistent for me. Agree with the ULR Phosphorous. Did I hear they are coming out with a nitrate or did I imagine that?
 
I use the alk and phosphourus checker. The latter because I am working towards a Ultra low nutrient system. Highly recommend both.
 
I use the ULR phosphorous meter because I want better or idiom at the low range. It does produce results as parts per billion phosphorus (ppb Pi) and not PO4. Just multiply P by 3.06 to convert the reading to ppb PO4. Divide that by 1000 to convert that to ppm PO4; which is what most people report.

I also use the Alk and the Ca checkers. I have all good to report on all three checkers.


I've done repeat readings on my Ca checker and have gotten fairly consistent results. The refills are a bit more costly for the Ca checker compares to the Alk and Pi.
 
3.066. :)

BTW, the phosphorous checker is made for marine water, the phosphate is not.

I use the ULR phosphorous meter because I want better or idiom at the low range. It does produce results as parts per billion phosphorus (ppb Pi) and not PO4. Just multiply P by 3.06 to convert the reading to ppb PO4. Divide that by 1000 to convert that to ppm PO4; which is what most people report.

I also use the Alk and the Ca checkers. I have all good to report on all three checkers.


I've done repeat readings on my Ca checker and have gotten fairly consistent results. The refills are a bit more costly for the Ca checker compares to the Alk and Pi.
 
Just purchased the Alk and CA checkers myself. Alk is super easy to use...still have to read the instructions on the CA so far...
 
phosphorous all day. alk, calc, mag, and nitrate through salifert
 
Salifert. lol. I haven't decided which one to switch to.
hahah. My salifert tells me if I'm being really bad (25-50+) or really good (10-). That's about as much detail as I need. Then again, my corals tell me more than that test kit. extended and vibrant=don't worry
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top