I think your fine honestly. Can you add a jack stud in the back of the stand to help?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think your fine honestly. Can you add a jack stud in the back of the stand to help?
The initial deflection I wouldn't worry about. My suggestion was based on long term loading.
Sorry if you're getting confused by many opinions. As I mentioned earlier, the answer is in the math. Calculate the load, check your material.
You'll be fine, that is very well supported.
I imagine you had fun doing that? Good job on it
72*28 is 14sqft. 260g x 8.3lb = 2,158lbs. That means 154psf load for the water alone. That's at least quadruple what building codes are designed for.
Something less than half the weight will be on the 2x8 (other carried by 3 walls). Let's use 1200lbs because it's easy and leaves some excess. 6ft span (I know it's a little less) is 200plf (pounds per lineal foot).
The problem you may be having is most charts are for joists with spacing and something like 30live/10dead loading with l/360 deflection which translates into the range of 50plf. Using those numbers is unacceptable.
I don't know what species would you used, but the only chart I can get my eyes on is for southern pine, which is considered a high grade structural lumber. A 2x8 single ply in 6ft span can take 335plf... so no worries. However, SPF (spruce) won't have that high rating, but it wouldn't be 30% less.
Going through a window/door header chart, everything is 2-ply because that's really the only way it's ever done. This is where it caught my attention, because if doing a 6' opening in an interior load bearing partition, IRC would have me building a 2-2x10 header... using SPF #2.
Girder charts are similar. I could go through and reverse calculate some of the loads on the chart and then compare them against your needs, but it's a bit of a guess and check maneuver.
It's evidently adequate based on what I can find. It's just approaching design limit and nearly everyone likes to shoot well beyond when supporting a box of water. Obviously lumber companies aren't sitting around coming up with charts for such loads.
This is all worth exactly what you paid for it and there's no engineer stamp.
www.reef2reef.com
72*28 is 14sqft. 260g x 8.3lb = 2,158lbs. That means 154psf load for the water alone. That's at least quadruple what building codes are designed for.
Something less than half the weight will be on the 2x8 (other carried by 3 walls). Let's use 1200lbs because it's easy and leaves some excess. 6ft span (I know it's a little less) is 200plf (pounds per lineal foot).
The problem you may be having is most charts are for joists with spacing and something like 30live/10dead loading with l/360 deflection which translates into the range of 50plf. Using those numbers is unacceptable.
I don't know what species would you used, but the only chart I can get my eyes on is for southern pine, which is considered a high grade structural lumber. A 2x8 single ply in 6ft span can take 335plf... so no worries. However, SPF (spruce) won't have that high rating, but it wouldn't be 30% less.
Going through a window/door header chart, everything is 2-ply because that's really the only way it's ever done. This is where it caught my attention, because if doing a 6' opening in an interior load bearing partition, IRC would have me building a 2-2x10 header... using SPF #2.
Girder charts are similar. I could go through and reverse calculate some of the loads on the chart and then compare them against your needs, but it's a bit of a guess and check maneuver.
It's evidently adequate based on what I can find. It's just approaching design limit and nearly everyone likes to shoot well beyond when supporting a box of water. Obviously lumber companies aren't sitting around coming up with charts for such loads.
This is all worth exactly what you paid for it and there's no engineer stamp.
I would suggest using a polyurethane glue, such as Loctite PL premium or even Gorilla Glue.
Fasteners would typically be nails 4 or 5 vertical every 12-16" but if you want to use screws that's fine. For this most any construction screw would work. For reference GRK, Spax, Simpson, etc. offer wood specific with a star drive, looks like you have something similar already. I typically reserve through bolting for situations where there is leverage or inconsistent loading (motion).
The option of angle iron attached to underside of 2x8 could be considered as well if you are still feeling uneasy and don't like scabbing ply on. A plywood ring frame would work too. Depending on the header you built over the tank, you can transfer loads up to that. Still a number of ways to skin the cat, as they say.
To go back to loads and deflection, I believe the target when working around glass is 0% deflection, and if you look at all the stands for smaller tanks, that's what is achieved. We use the same standard when working with stone counters and with ceramic floors it's usually L/720 minimum. So when discussing whether a particular beam will carry the load... yes... absolutely, but at what tolerance? That's probably where the multitude of opinions and info comes from, not everyone is using the same considerations. The issue is not about whether the beam will fail in the sense of it breaking, but will it lack the performance to properly support the tank over time. I just read the tank weighs some 550lbs on it's own, so there's another roughly 45plf to tack on to the calculation.
I don't see a 6' span, but it's entirely possible I'm missing something. between your load bearing wall and your new jack supports looks to be 3' max. The tank is 6' long, but it's not spanning a joist or two, it's running perpendicular to the joists and crossing over a number of them.

