Maybe I'm the only one, but I have to call at least some agenda based BS in that article. I was going to post a thread, but you beat me to it

. One, it is based on one species of coral done in the wild. To draw absolutes from one small data set is irresponsible of Coral magazine. I generally try to cut larger frags now that have decent sized colonies, but over the last decade, I've probably cut at least several thousand SPS frags, all of which were glued out of water. If I'd had even as low as 75 percent (percent sign doesn't work) survivability on them, I'd never frag again (have only had nice sized colonies the last three or so years). Sure, more surface area puts on more surface area more quickly than less surface area, but to make the blanket statements they made irritated me. There are very few absolutes in life... Larger frags never hurt, but to say that if you cut 1" frags and glue out of water, you'll only see 20% survival rates is straight up crap. Numbers do what you want them to...