Looking for 2-part to compliment TM A & K

reefiniteasy

Check me out on IG!
View Badges
Joined
Jun 6, 2018
Messages
2,356
Reaction score
5,351
Location
Orlando, FL
What state or country do you live in
Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have been using Tropic Marin A & K on my softy tank since last December. I have seen wonderful results. I now have some LPS n the softy tan. I am converting the other tank to anemone only and am slowly moving the LPS over. What 2-part would compliment the TM A & K, as I don’t want to stop using it?

IMG_5321.jpeg
IMG_5317.jpeg
IMG_5320.jpeg
IMG_5322.jpeg
 
I’m going to search, but do you have a link to a thread with the DIY and how it combines with part C?

BRS has a recipe for this purpose. It should functionally be equivalent to ESV, as long as the calcium and alk solutions you use are adequately pure.
 
Have you considered all for reef?

Yes, not interested in leaving A & K. I’m invested in those because I’ve seen the results but also I have a healthy supply and the dosers are running. But I also like the idea of being able to adjust Alk and Cal but not have to mess with the A and K that I have dialed in.
 
BRS has a recipe for this purpose. It should functionally be equivalent to ESV, as long as the calcium and alk solutions you use are adequately pure.

Is there anything in ESV that would not mix well with A & K? Like too much of something that is in both products or a combination that isn’t good? I’d very much prefer to use ESV as I like their 2-Part.
 
Is there anything in ESV that would not mix well with A & K? Like too much of something that is in both products or a combination that isn’t good? I’d very much prefer to use ESV as I like their 2-Part.

You mean literally mix them together? I cannot be sure, but that is probably ok just like using the TM balling parts with A and K.

If you mean use both, just not mixed together, that’s perfectly fine.
 
You mean literally mix them together? I cannot be sure, but that is probably ok just like using the TM balling parts with A and K.

If you mean use both, just not mixed together, that’s perfectly fine.

I meant using both, not mixed together. Thank you! Just wanted to be sure there are no conflicts between the products. I appreciate the help.

ESV it is, I’m comfortable and familiar with it.
 
I meant using both, not mixed together. Thank you! Just wanted to be sure there are no conflicts between the products. I appreciate the help.

ESV it is, I’m comfortable and familiar with it.

That sounds like an excellent plan to me. :)
 
Yes, not interested in leaving A & K. I’m invested in those because I’ve seen the results but also I have a healthy supply and the dosers are running. But I also like the idea of being able to adjust Alk and Cal but not have to mess with the A and K that I have dialed in.
All For Reef has A & K in it. It might be the easiest solution and I bet you'd see the same or similar results.
 
All For Reef has A & K in it. It might be the easiest solution and I bet you'd see the same or similar results.

But it couples trace elements to alk and calcium, which in general is not the optimal solution.
 
But it couples trace elements to alk and calcium, which in general is not the optimal solution.
What you mean? Like from a controllability standpoint? I used all for reef for a while with great results after switching from kalk with A & K.
 
Video below Lou talks about adding A and K to other solutions. So you could use whatever 2 part solution you chose be it DIY or over the counter like ESV. You should choose which one works best for you as it relates to your time, comfort, budget, etc.

If you like A and K then I would continue on in the video as Lou also talks a bit about the All For Reef product. As noted above it already has A and K in it and it is a single dose solution. It comes in liquid or powder form. The 1600 g powder option is probably the cheapest in the long run as it makes 10 liters and what most of us use with large systems and high demand.

Lastly there is then the original balling method which Tropic Marin started which is a three part.

 
What you mean? Like from a controllability standpoint? I used all for reef for a while with great results after switching from kalk with A & K.

Yes. It adds trace elements ina fixed proportion to alk and calcium, which cannot be optimal for all aquaria. A tank with slower growing or fewer hard corals corals may not get enough and a tank with faster growing and more hard corals may get too much.
 
Yes. It adds trace elements ina fixed proportion to alk and calcium, which cannot be optimal for all aquaria. A tank with slower growing or fewer hard corals corals may not get enough and a tank with faster growing and more hard corals may get too much.

Cannot be optimal for all aquaria is a pretty bold statement don't you think? How is that different than water changes or the favorite two part or any other product marketed in the hobby? Outside of ICP testing (which is another interesting subject) how are we even measuring specific trace element consumption rates.

Edit: btw not arguing with you just curious as to the "cannot" part.
 
Last edited:
Use TM Balling A, B, & C. Mix the K trace elements with A (calcium) and the A trace elements with B (alkalinity).
For example, I mix 80 ml trace elements in a 1500 ml dosing solution. I also add 80 ml rodi water to C to adjust the concentration to A & B
 
Cannot be optimal for all aquaria is a pretty bold statement don't you think? How is that different than water changes or the favorite two part or any other product marketed in the hobby? Outside of ICP testing (which is another interesting subject) how are we even measuring specific trace element consumption rates.

Edit: btw not arguing with you just curious as to the "cannot" part.

perhaps you misunderstood what I wrote. “Cannot be optimal for all aquaria” only means that there is at least one aquarium for which it is not optimal, and that is guaranteed to be true.

I think you may have interpreted it to read as “cannot be optimal for any aquaria”, which I am not claiming based on my rationale for the statement.
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top