My fancy new tester came!!!

Thank you for all your helpful info. I had been looking at this same tester because I hate testing, too, and would love having one test to do it all. My LFS uses this same tester, but they charge almost $11 per test so it will probably be beneficial in the long run to pick this up. Brian
Yes that’s exactly how I learned about this unit too. I was tired of going to the fish store and paying for my water to be tested and tiny Hanna Checkers weren’t the most convenient.
 
Thanks, I didn't realize that was different.
Most don’t I didn’t at first because it looks the exact same but LaMotte has several versions of the WaterLink Spin Touch including multiple pool versions, drinking water ones, and of course the fish farming/aquaculture one.
 
Most don’t I didn’t at first because it looks the exact same but LaMotte has several versions of the WaterLink Spin Touch including multiple pool versions, drinking water ones, and of course the fish farming/aquaculture one.
Thanks for the important info. I don't want to buy the wrong type.
 
I saw this a little over a year ago. they a use version to measure swimming pool parameters as well. I was wondering about the accuracy for the salt water aquarium version. their website suggests they use them commercially at aquariums and fish farms?
 
I saw this a little over a year ago. they a use version to measure swimming pool parameters as well. I was wondering about the accuracy for the salt water aquarium version. their website suggests they use them commercially at aquariums and fish farms?
Yes they do. I explain everything in this thread and the accuracy.:)
 
Last edited:
Thanks for sharing @revhtree
67469AEA-020A-452C-8E5D-92EC3F029B11.png
 
I think maybe you meant to say for those running ULN systems. Otherwise it will be fine. Ignoring everything else for a minute the one thing that would stand out is test consistency.

While I am not personally interested in the kit do you know if it has a data logger or way to export data? If so what format or how?

Thanks for taking the time to post about your experience.
Yes it does! It logs it on the system, you can print it, and there’s a service you can pay for to log it into your phone via Bluetooth and track it. That’s more for sending results to customers though and not worth paying for when it’s your own tester because it logs them in the unit.
 
Also hard to believe your calcium is 520
 
Have you calibrated it?? How can your nitrates truly be 0 and phosphates 0.2??
Yea I did! Again because the tank is full of macroalgae and when doing other tests kits has always run low because it’s a minimally stocked and fed nano loaded with macros. My nitrate is now up to one which is on track with my dosing because I dosed some after this result.
 
Also hard to believe your calcium is 520
Again no unit it perfect. I like it for fast results because I have multiple tanks in different locations. I also don’t keep hard to keep SPS corals and don’t dose my reef tank. And since running another test on the unit I believe it’s closer to 415 and makes more sense. I want to do a batch of freshly mixed saltwater I did run the same test multiple times and got the same results. I ran back to back tests as well and got very similar results/almost identical as well.
 
Again no unit it perfect. I like it for fast results because I have multiple tanks in different locations. I also don’t keep hard to keep SPS corals and don’t dose my reef tank.
Yeah, there's always a standard error but for the sake of accuracy you might want to try to find the value of that standard error using averages from other test kits...i understand that calcium isn't important to you though if you don't keep hard corals (even LPS have a sort of skeleton though)...just an fyi, not only might you want to find a range for the standard error but recalibrate fairly frequently. I work with professional spectrophotometers at a university and even they need to be recalibrated fairly frequently. I do understand that you don't like testing. I do feel like theres less room for error when dealing with titration based test kits, however, than purely colorimetric or even spectrophotometric testers depending due to the complexity involved. Chemicals are chemicals at at certain concentration and chemistry dictates they will react the same every time if performed correctly while spectrophotometers are very complex and leave plenty more room for not just user errors but internal errors as well. Again, i do fully understand the disdain towards manual testing, i personally would just prefer to invest that amount of money in other ways for my tanks.
 
I’d also like to be completely transparent here and say LaMotte clearly stated/told me this prior to buying. I’d also like to mention in this thread this product is originally marketed towards and still is marketed towards fish farming/aquaculture purposes. I recognize this device isn’t for everyone. But if you have a fowlr tank, multiple tanks, freshwater tanks, cycle/care for tanks, have an aquarium business, hate testing/don’t have time, etc. then this unit is great. Please know as well that the API AquaSpin and LaMotte Water Link SpinTouch version 3587 (that version only) are both made by LaMotte and the same size and accuracy the only difference is the reagents are flipped on opposite sides forcing you to buy the disks specifically made for that unit. Again I think it depends on your own goals for your tank, what kind of tank you have, and your budget as to whether or not the unit is right for you.
B2FC36FC-4E9D-4A90-AEDF-4520FE485A46.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Yeah, there's always a standard error but for the sake of accuracy you might want to try to find the value of that standard error using averages from other test kits...i understand that calcium isn't important to you though if you don't keep hard corals (even LPS have a sort of skeleton though)...just an fyi, not only might you want to find a range for the standard error but recalibrate fairly frequently. I work with professional spectrophotometers at a university and even they need to be recalibrated fairly frequently. I do understand that you don't like testing. I do feel like theres less room for error when dealing with titration based test kits, however, than purely colorimetric or even spectrophotometric testers depending due to the complexity involved. Chemicals are chemicals at at certain concentration and chemistry dictates they will react the same every time if performed correctly while spectrophotometers are very complex and leave plenty more room for not just user errors but internal errors as well. Again, i do fully understand the disdain towards manual testing, i personally would just prefer to invest that amount of money in other ways for my tanks.
I plan too and actually you can only check calibrate it…you have to send it out for repairs/to be calculated by LaMotte if there’s major discrepancies.
 
Yeah, there's always a standard error but for the sake of accuracy you might want to try to find the value of that standard error using averages from other test kits...i understand that calcium isn't important to you though if you don't keep hard corals (even LPS have a sort of skeleton though)...just an fyi, not only might you want to find a range for the standard error but recalibrate fairly frequently. I work with professional spectrophotometers at a university and even they need to be recalibrated fairly frequently. I do understand that you don't like testing. I do feel like theres less room for error when dealing with titration based test kits, however, than purely colorimetric or even spectrophotometric testers depending due to the complexity involved. Chemicals are chemicals at at certain concentration and chemistry dictates they will react the same every time if performed correctly while spectrophotometers are very complex and leave plenty more room for not just user errors but internal errors as well. Again, i do fully understand the disdain towards manual testing, i personally would just prefer to invest that amount of money in other ways for my tanks.
Quote from LaMotte!

Q: How often does my WaterLink Spin meter need to be calibrated?​

A: Generally, your Spin meter does not need to be recalibrated. Unlike other photometers, the Spin’s calibrations do not “drift” over time. However, it is possible for your Spin meter to outright lose it’s calibration settings. When this happens, it’s fairly obvious that your results are wrong because they will be VERY wrong.
 
For those of you thinking about it or maybe you have one already! This is currently the only place in America (online) you can buy version 3587 and disks without an account or being a business. You can also contact LaMotte directly but the units and disks are now on backorder for up to 6 months. This is the company where I bought mine and they are expecting more units March 10th and both the disks and units sell out quickly so keep checking! https://www.forestry-suppliers.com/p/94820/60230/lamotte-waterlink-spin-touch-ff-photometer I’ve also posted about the unit in a few other places in the forum if you search LaMotte and my username they will appear.
 
Last edited:
Im sorry to say but Every spectrophotometer needs to be recalibrated...they inevitably will show variations from the actual results and the error will only be amplified. That's a function of spectrophotometers regardless of what the company says...like i said, i work with laboratory grade professional spectrophotometers and they do need to be recalibrated...the more often the better
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top