- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction score
- 14
- What state or country do you live in
- California
A New on Brown Jelly Disease (BJD).
Let me preface with: I am not a Professional nor a Marine Biologist. I am just a Hobbyist. This is my Observation.
From lite reading and being on R2R and other forums: Brown Jelly Disease kills Euphyllia quickly and spreads quickly; environmental stressors and bacteria (debatable) are the main causes. "Wall" types are more susceptible to this disease than the branching varieties. Some of these BJD deaths are in stable, ideal water parameters, flow, and light setting. There are no known treatments. The current best practice is to remove the dead head(s) and dip the remaining surviving head(s) in Iodine (or some other chemicals). The survival rate from this best practice is low.
My tank was about 1 year old when I experienced BJD in my tank. It wiped out 7 pieces of my Euphyllia, while other softies were doing fine. These dead pieces, ranging from single head to multiple heads of Wall Hammer, Branching Hammer, and Torches in various locations within the tank. I tested the water once a week at that time; these were approximate values (don't remember the exact numbers, but know it was nothing that jumped out for a softy tank):
Alk ~ 8.5 (Salifert)
No3 ~ 4 ppm (Red Sea)
Phos ~ 0.3 ppm (Hanna)
Cal and Mg were within operational ranges.
During the course of the 1.5 months with BJD, I noticed the Euphyllia died one piece at a time. Kind of make me question why would something so contagious kills only one piece at a time and not mass casualties. As I was cutting off the dead heads to perform "best practice", I noticed the skeletons were porous and the dead heads seemed like they were about to split (sign of the curve-in indent). The dead pieces were all mounted, either by me or from the seller. The BJD death eventually stopped without any treatments, leaving me only 2 colonies of frogspawn and a single head hammer (They are still alive today...knock on wood). So with these observations:
1) No multiple deaths at one time.
2) Porous skeleton.
3) Dead heads were about to split.
4) Mounted pieces.
I came to a conclusion, "Mounting Euphyllia MIGHT be another cause of BJD". Why? Since the skeleton is porous, I believe there are transport channels within this structure facilitating some nutrient or waste import/export from the base (Fig. A). When a seller/hobbyist mounts the coral base with either Crazy glue or Epoxy, it seals and reduces the transport pathways (Fig. B). The coral continues to survive relying mainly on the import/export nutrients/waste through the head. Once a head begins to reproduce (Split), it requires extra "energy" (Fig. C). Since the nutrient transport paths are reduced; with lack of "energy", the coral stresses out and die, showing BJ (Fig. D).
Using this theory to apply to what I read on this forum:
- The Wall-Euphyllia are more susceptible to BJD because they do not have extra Heads to serve as additional import/export pathways when we closed the base. Therefore, they might die before reproducing. This scenario applies to branching single-head purchase as well (as one single head, it acts like a wall variety). A branching COLONY has a better chance to survive since it has many heads serving as alternative pathways
- The "best practice" sometimes works because when we chopped off the dead head (Fig. G), we are now providing another import/export pathway. (Q: So why are the surviving heads still die? A: It might be too late from the stress.)
(Maybe related: I currently have two colonies of frogspawn that are putting out heads. Some of these newer heads, located on the shaded part of the colony, slowly died off so they were on the smaller size. I am wondering if these are "Sacrificial heads" generated to make more import/export pathways).
With that, there will be questions:
Q: How do I know that there are transport channels?
A: I don't; just speculating since they are porous.
Q: So why tightly-packed mounted branching colonies still striving?
A: A branching COLONY has a better chance to survive since they have many heads serving as alternative pathways. Also, if it has been fragged, then the cut site becomes a new pathway.
Q: Why are mounted, un-fragged striving colonies in Hobbyist tanks lasted for YEARS?
A: Might be related to how tightly-packed the original mounting adhesive was made. If the base was not 100% sealed than there is better chance to survive. Or, if the colony is putting out "Sacrificial heads" (more pathways).
Q: Why MY single head hammer survived?
A: Luck? J/k...I did not mount the piece so I cannot tell how tightly-packed the epoxy site was.
That is all I have. I've been buying Euphyllia again (7 months without buying). My new mounting technique is to mount/remount the piece without covering the base opening. Again, this is my observation. Hopefully, if true, it can help with unexplained deaths and spare the frustration. Now let me have it
Let me preface with: I am not a Professional nor a Marine Biologist. I am just a Hobbyist. This is my Observation.
From lite reading and being on R2R and other forums: Brown Jelly Disease kills Euphyllia quickly and spreads quickly; environmental stressors and bacteria (debatable) are the main causes. "Wall" types are more susceptible to this disease than the branching varieties. Some of these BJD deaths are in stable, ideal water parameters, flow, and light setting. There are no known treatments. The current best practice is to remove the dead head(s) and dip the remaining surviving head(s) in Iodine (or some other chemicals). The survival rate from this best practice is low.
My tank was about 1 year old when I experienced BJD in my tank. It wiped out 7 pieces of my Euphyllia, while other softies were doing fine. These dead pieces, ranging from single head to multiple heads of Wall Hammer, Branching Hammer, and Torches in various locations within the tank. I tested the water once a week at that time; these were approximate values (don't remember the exact numbers, but know it was nothing that jumped out for a softy tank):
Alk ~ 8.5 (Salifert)
No3 ~ 4 ppm (Red Sea)
Phos ~ 0.3 ppm (Hanna)
Cal and Mg were within operational ranges.
During the course of the 1.5 months with BJD, I noticed the Euphyllia died one piece at a time. Kind of make me question why would something so contagious kills only one piece at a time and not mass casualties. As I was cutting off the dead heads to perform "best practice", I noticed the skeletons were porous and the dead heads seemed like they were about to split (sign of the curve-in indent). The dead pieces were all mounted, either by me or from the seller. The BJD death eventually stopped without any treatments, leaving me only 2 colonies of frogspawn and a single head hammer (They are still alive today...knock on wood). So with these observations:
1) No multiple deaths at one time.
2) Porous skeleton.
3) Dead heads were about to split.
4) Mounted pieces.
I came to a conclusion, "Mounting Euphyllia MIGHT be another cause of BJD". Why? Since the skeleton is porous, I believe there are transport channels within this structure facilitating some nutrient or waste import/export from the base (Fig. A). When a seller/hobbyist mounts the coral base with either Crazy glue or Epoxy, it seals and reduces the transport pathways (Fig. B). The coral continues to survive relying mainly on the import/export nutrients/waste through the head. Once a head begins to reproduce (Split), it requires extra "energy" (Fig. C). Since the nutrient transport paths are reduced; with lack of "energy", the coral stresses out and die, showing BJ (Fig. D).
Using this theory to apply to what I read on this forum:
- The Wall-Euphyllia are more susceptible to BJD because they do not have extra Heads to serve as additional import/export pathways when we closed the base. Therefore, they might die before reproducing. This scenario applies to branching single-head purchase as well (as one single head, it acts like a wall variety). A branching COLONY has a better chance to survive since it has many heads serving as alternative pathways
- The "best practice" sometimes works because when we chopped off the dead head (Fig. G), we are now providing another import/export pathway. (Q: So why are the surviving heads still die? A: It might be too late from the stress.)
(Maybe related: I currently have two colonies of frogspawn that are putting out heads. Some of these newer heads, located on the shaded part of the colony, slowly died off so they were on the smaller size. I am wondering if these are "Sacrificial heads" generated to make more import/export pathways).
With that, there will be questions:
Q: How do I know that there are transport channels?
A: I don't; just speculating since they are porous.
Q: So why tightly-packed mounted branching colonies still striving?
A: A branching COLONY has a better chance to survive since they have many heads serving as alternative pathways. Also, if it has been fragged, then the cut site becomes a new pathway.
Q: Why are mounted, un-fragged striving colonies in Hobbyist tanks lasted for YEARS?
A: Might be related to how tightly-packed the original mounting adhesive was made. If the base was not 100% sealed than there is better chance to survive. Or, if the colony is putting out "Sacrificial heads" (more pathways).
Q: Why MY single head hammer survived?
A: Luck? J/k...I did not mount the piece so I cannot tell how tightly-packed the epoxy site was.
That is all I have. I've been buying Euphyllia again (7 months without buying). My new mounting technique is to mount/remount the piece without covering the base opening. Again, this is my observation. Hopefully, if true, it can help with unexplained deaths and spare the frustration. Now let me have it



