Vodka, vinegar, biopellets are the same thing!
Not really...
And if they are I guess I should rewrite the lecture/presentation that I've been giving all over the country for the last 2 years and maybe the US Patent application too. :squigglemouth:
The definition of dosing is to add something to the water stream. Pellets add nothing to the water stream. Soluble Carbon dosing causes a temporary and unnatural condition whereas excess nutrients cause a "mini-bloom" of bacteria. These bacteria consume PO4 and NO3 and are either skimmed off, settle out or are consumed by something in the tank as bacterioplankton.
"Bio Pellets" are a substrate and a food source for bacteria in the water stream but limit the bacterial growth to the reactor. The bacteria population on the pellets will be consistent depending on the nutrient content in the water. Essentially it is "self adjusting", there will be more bacterial biomass when there are excess nutrients in the water and less bacterial biomass when the water has fewer nutrients.
Since there is a basically unlimited Carbon supply available, but not in the water stream, PO4 and NO3 are constantly consumed unless there is a deficiency of either PO4 or NO3. Since the Carbon supply is NOT in the water stream, it is not a food source for Cyanobacteria or other organisms in the main display tank or on your substrate.
Regarding "Bio Pellets" and Carbon dosing, no soluble Carbon is released into the water stream. Remember, "Bio Pellets" are inert... you can run them in a reactor at 1000GPH for 100 years in sterile salt water and they will not decompose or break down. They add NOTHING to the water. Only bacteria can break down the "Bio Pellets" and that is a biochemical process where the bacteria convert the polymer to another substance and absorb it through their own cell wall by osmosis. So even bacterial conversion can't add the "Bio Pellet" Carbon source to the water stream.
The closest similarity is the export of the bacterial biomass via the protein skimmer in both methods.