It is the non-sequitur nature of the argument that I do not understand... wanting to be as natural as possible with ramping and thunderstorms and lunar cycles, yet also choosing the most unnatural type of lighting as far as spectrum and how the photons enter the tank.
That is incorrect really.. suns rays are collimated perp. to the earth Well at whatever angle the sun is..
Point is they are ALL parallel w/ scatter .. sometimes none..well a lot less (cloudless.. HARSH shadows) sometimes all (cloudy, soft shadows)
LED's are more "natural" than halides or more unnatural tubes..
LEDs mostly cloudless ...mh.. partly cloudy...Tubes.. cloudy..
ROUGHLY..don't nit pick..
As to spectrum that is also incorrect as I've shown in dozens of "pretty charts"..
NONE are natural.. and is just a matter of degrees... Adding ramping is a plus and, frankly, mostly cosmetic (barring spooking fish) BUT one that some PREFER by CHOICE..
Nothing wrong w/ that ..
PRETTY graphic for the day
It is EASIER to make LED's as Natural as you want..
tight optics.. so narrow beams up high (parallel rays) precession from horizon to horizon angle (easy-er to do w/ LEDs due to weight /design) that almost NOBODY does..
would need some sort of controlled diffusion (controlled lenses shifting from tight to wide beam 5-26% "scatter")to make it perfect though.
IS it "necessary"?? not really but don't say MH's are more "natural" in presentation than LEDs.. just not so except at a VERY specific moment in time and conditions..
sorry just is AFAICT.