It's pretty simple.. watts = volts x amps..
Problem is the diodes should be listed like "3 Watt class" since that is more realistic, but doesn't sell well does it?
If the V(f) at 1Amp is 3V it's 3 Watts (per diode).
Doesn't really mean a THING (in a general sense) about photon (PAR) output. Separate metric.. like 100 Lumens /Watt, which will give you an idea of efficiency.
A diode run at 1W w/ an efficiency of 150Lumens/watt is equal to a 3W diode w/ an efficiency of 50Lumens/Watt.
sorry just using lumen as a convenience here.. Could be PAR ect per Watt.
The Orphek "looks" to be running the diodes at an effective 2W output (or close) which is pretty normal for this "type" of diode.
One needs to balance watts (heat) vs longevity/reliance, thus few are run "full" wattage...especially fanless..
Switch the driver to output greater than 550mA and your wattage will increase..but so will your heating and more than likely decrease your "mean time between failure" of the diodes..
to repeat this a bit.. wattage has little to do w/ output with out knowing diode efficiency..or the advantage of "direction-ality" for that matter..
It's sad that few list "real" watts, and even that isn't always perfect either..constant voltage arrays may have "real" watts but some of this is from the terminating resistors and thus NOT generated by the diodes themselves..
so again, sort of misleading.
One would really need to know the exact voltage and amp draw AT the diodes to get "real" numbers..
bottom line, it's only the # of photons that count and the reason "PAR" is really the only thing that counts, unless you want to save a few pennies (or more) on electricity..