- Joined
- May 20, 2017
- Messages
- 590
- Reaction score
- 795
Oops...its accuracy is less than...its accuracy is greater than
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oops...its accuracy is less than...its accuracy is greater than
You're absolutely right, your multi-LED spectral measurement differs. Sorry if my "amateur" measurements are somehow insulting to you. I don't appreciate you calling the piece of equipment I and other hobbyists are using "crap". It suits my purposes. I've grown tired of this kind of self-important elitist attitude in a hobby I've loved for decades. I have had a number of successful reef aquariums without the need to tell everyone that I spent $XXXX on a piece of equipment that contributes zero to the health of my tank. As far as being able to identify small peaks in an entire spectrum, neither you nor anyone else can say that an insignificantly small peak at 460nm is a significant feature that will have X affect on your Oregon tort. Good enough is good enough.You are using a PARwise to show me that the peaks don't match the advertised spectrum? Suggest using an alternative spectrometer. You'll find that using the PARwise to defend your position is unwise, as its accuracy is greater than the diodes you're attempting to smear.
Yep. They're definitely different. What exactly was measured?Here's how far off the PARwise is from an actual spectrometer. This is my data, not something found online. Same light, same conditions, but different spectrometers. One is good, one is crap. What I don't understand is why the PARwise software hasn't been adjusted to eliminate the chopping of the peak spectrum and the left shift of its data. That should be an easy fix, but it has been that way since its release.
![]()
Not at all insulting, but your "proof" is faulty. Grab a Hopoocolor or UPRtek. Best that you learn from your own experience.Sorry if my "amateur" measurements are somehow insulting to you.
excellent product!Interesting
![]()
PARwise is a New Light Sensor from ITC ReefCulture | Reef Builders | The Reef and Saltwater Aquarium Blog
PARwise is an intelligent new light sensor from ITC Reefculture which aims to help shed some light on what is going on in our aquariums. The new PARwise appears to share some DNA with the Seneye from…reefbuilders.com
Yeah, insulting and condescending.Not at all insulting, but your "proof" is faulty. Grab a Hopoocolor or UPRtek. Best that you learn from your own experience.
I'm interested. How much does it cost for the average person to "grab" each of those, and what are the best places to get them?Not at all insulting, but your "proof" is faulty. Grab a Hopoocolor or UPRtek. Best that you learn from your own experience.
Disregard. The Hopoocolor starts at $350 on Amazon, with one model at $1,000. The UPRTEK MK350S sells for $3,400??? Wow.I'm interested. How much does it cost for the average person to "grab" each of those, and what are the best places to get them?
gamma-sci.com
$299, Premium Aquatics, 30 Apr.How much did you pay for your parwise? Asking for a friend, LOL.
No. Simply accurate. I have what you're using. You're basing your position on faulty data. That ain't your fault.Yeah, insulting and condescending.
In my experience, yes.Excuse my ignorance..., but isnt the difference in most these measurements "close enough" given the price difference of the tools measuring them. For a manufacturer, I get it. But as a hobbyist, does that 5%(rough, in head, estimate) matter?
I'm wondering why it would matter with halides. You can't adjust the spectra. You're pretty much stuck with what you have.And how does this pairwise do with halides, is it compatible?
It really doesn't matter. And I'm not stuck, I'm committed. There is a difference ;-) but it could be useful for determining bulb decline to determine when to replace bulbs. Or maybe to help blend supplement leds, to the spectrum betterI'm wondering why it would matter with halides. You can't adjust the spectra. You're pretty much stuck with what you have.
Yes it does matter? Why?In my experience, yes.
Not when you're using that data to suggest that 450nm diode ain't 450nm. There's a better chance that your meter reading is off, not the diode. Diodes not matching the advertised spectrum was the basis or your entire argument.In my experience, yes.
Given BRS' data, I'd like to see the spectrums align better. For me, it's just too far off to be of value, but I'd expect that tuning the result via software could be a thing. If they aligned those peaks, I'd absolutly recommend it for hobbyist use.Excuse my ignorance..., but isnt the difference in most these measurements "close enough" given the price difference of the tools measuring them. For a manufacturer, I get it. But as a hobbyist, does that 5%(rough, in head, estimate) matter?

