PARwise

You are using a PARwise to show me that the peaks don't match the advertised spectrum? Suggest using an alternative spectrometer. You'll find that using the PARwise to defend your position is unwise, as its accuracy is greater than the diodes you're attempting to smear.
You're absolutely right, your multi-LED spectral measurement differs. Sorry if my "amateur" measurements are somehow insulting to you. I don't appreciate you calling the piece of equipment I and other hobbyists are using "crap". It suits my purposes. I've grown tired of this kind of self-important elitist attitude in a hobby I've loved for decades. I have had a number of successful reef aquariums without the need to tell everyone that I spent $XXXX on a piece of equipment that contributes zero to the health of my tank. As far as being able to identify small peaks in an entire spectrum, neither you nor anyone else can say that an insignificantly small peak at 460nm is a significant feature that will have X affect on your Oregon tort. Good enough is good enough.

So...What I have found, however, is that I can measure any number of individual LEDs and get exactly the same measurement with each LED no matter how many times I measure them--down to the nanometer. So no matter how far off "truth" it is, it's been incredibly consistent.

The measurements I provided were for single wavelength, single element LEDs. For my DIY purposes, that's all I need. I have a friend duplicating my measurements with lab-grade equipment. If he determines I have some built-in bias, I can compensate for that.
 
Here's how far off the PARwise is from an actual spectrometer. This is my data, not something found online. Same light, same conditions, but different spectrometers. One is good, one is crap. What I don't understand is why the PARwise software hasn't been adjusted to eliminate the chopping of the peak spectrum and the left shift of its data. That should be an easy fix, but it has been that way since its release.

1702825557048.jpeg
Yep. They're definitely different. What exactly was measured?
 
Sorry if my "amateur" measurements are somehow insulting to you.
Not at all insulting, but your "proof" is faulty. Grab a Hopoocolor or UPRtek. Best that you learn from your own experience.
 
I'm interested. How much does it cost for the average person to "grab" each of those, and what are the best places to get them?
Disregard. The Hopoocolor starts at $350 on Amazon, with one model at $1,000. The UPRTEK MK350S sells for $3,400??? Wow.

How much did you pay for your parwise? Asking for a friend, LOL.
 


 
How much did you pay for your parwise? Asking for a friend, LOL.
$299, Premium Aquatics, 30 Apr.

ITC does not tout the PARwise to be a good spectrometer. It's just a PAR meter with spectrometer capabilities.
 
Excuse my ignorance..., but isnt the difference in most these measurements "close enough" given the price difference of the tools measuring them. For a manufacturer, I get it. But as a hobbyist, does that 5%(rough, in head, estimate) matter?
 
Excuse my ignorance..., but isnt the difference in most these measurements "close enough" given the price difference of the tools measuring them. For a manufacturer, I get it. But as a hobbyist, does that 5%(rough, in head, estimate) matter?
In my experience, yes.
 
I'm wondering why it would matter with halides. You can't adjust the spectra. You're pretty much stuck with what you have.
It really doesn't matter. And I'm not stuck, I'm committed. There is a difference ;-) but it could be useful for determining bulb decline to determine when to replace bulbs. Or maybe to help blend supplement leds, to the spectrum better
 
In my experience, yes.
Not when you're using that data to suggest that 450nm diode ain't 450nm. There's a better chance that your meter reading is off, not the diode. Diodes not matching the advertised spectrum was the basis or your entire argument.

I, too, get my cheap from Ali, but I'll also buy from Amazon. That's not a quality position, as I think you'd be quite impressed by the Hopoocolor. In some was, it provides more granular data than the UPRtek. That, and the read spectrum is wider.

BTW, if you're reading sub-400nm data with your PARwise, it most likely isn't there.
 
Excuse my ignorance..., but isnt the difference in most these measurements "close enough" given the price difference of the tools measuring them. For a manufacturer, I get it. But as a hobbyist, does that 5%(rough, in head, estimate) matter?
Given BRS' data, I'd like to see the spectrums align better. For me, it's just too far off to be of value, but I'd expect that tuning the result via software could be a thing. If they aligned those peaks, I'd absolutly recommend it for hobbyist use.

1702841402982.jpeg


But if you just need a PAR meter, this is a better deal - https://a.co/d/6fljHKN
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top