This is only part of the story. The decrease in waste water you are seeing is due to the flow restrictor now not being tuned to the PSI you are pushing through the membrane as most are tuned out of the box for a certain PSI rating which we don't all have and also aren't necessarily running 77F temperature source water into the membranes either. Less waste water is not always a great thing, and it is not really "waste" as much as it is "flush" water, or brine. Unless you have really soft water, or water with less than 150-200 TDS, you should really not aim for a ratio less than 3:1 as you will foul the membrane faster, have increased TDS creep upon startup which eats DI resin faster, and generally more likely to run into problems down the road. I wouldn't even consider a second membrane with source water TDS>200 as now you are pushing the brine, or flush water, from one membrane which now has even more TDS (because it was rejected by the first membrane) into a second membrane. If your flush to product water is less than 3:1, your flow restrictor on the flush water/brine output of the membrane needs to be adjusted. If you have TDS>300, 4:1 will provide better life to the membrane, performance, and is industry standard for a reason.
I 100% agree with you on booster pumps and run one myself to get 90 PSI to the membrane, which gives me 99% rejection rate measured via pre and post-membrane samples. I run my brine water into my top-loading washing machine and try to make water on laundry days in order to better utilize the water I am paying for.
Remember to change out carbon/sediment filters on a regular basis to maintain the membrane and performance of the unit, I do mine every 6 months as the cost of carbon/sediment filters is cheap and here in SoCal our water is a bit harder than others.
EDIT: be careful running >70PSI on some units, if you do make sure you observe fittings for leaks, cracks, etc. Not all RODI canisters are made equal!