@Brew12 Could you comment on this article and the link at the bottom - some of the things they say I firstly don't understand and so would be curious on your comments:
http://angel-strike.com/aquarium/GroundingProbes.html
http://angel-strike.com/aquarium/GroundingProbes.html
Here is the introduction to the first article:
'Conventional wisdom found in magazine articles and in the bowers of world wide web chat rooms indicated that “voltage” in aquaria is one of the factors that can cause Hole in the Head and Lateral Line Erosion. We read quotes like, “Stray voltage is something that exists in every tank. Stray voltage can be eliminated with a simple ground probe available at most pet shops in the twenty dollar range. Elimination of stray voltage is a simple step in reducing the stress on your fish. Every marine tank should be grounded for your protection and that of your fish.” Is it true? Well not exactly, and as I will discuss below, the addition of a ground probe may even make matters worse!'
Here is a quote from the second:
'So now we have a system that can electrocute both the aquarist and the fish even though there is a properly installed GFI and ground probe. Were I to remove the ground probe, there would no longer be a current path affecting the fish (they are now the "birds on a wire"). The aquarist however, is still at risk if he touches the water and a ground. In reality, induced voltages and currents will be small... so small that they are probably NOT an issue for the safety of the aquarist, but with a grounding probe present, they could be unhealthy for the fish and coral (and I suspect they probably are, since sea life has little insulation to mitigate the current flow through their bodies. I can't believe that a continuous current flowing through one's body would not cause havoc with cellular ion transport, not to mention the "jamming" of sensory organs).'
Thank you for posting this! This is another article that someone with enough knowledge to be dangerous put together. They get much of the electrical theory correct but they miss some big picture items.
It would take longer than I have right now to dissect everything from both articles but I want to take a minute to focus on the second section you quoted.
"So now we have a system that can electrocute both the aquarist and the fish even though there is a properly installed GFI and ground probe."
You CANNOT electrocute a marine fish without taking it out of the water. Why? The water is more conductive than the fish. The majority of current will flow around a fish, not through it. If electrofishing worked in the ocean they would use it to collect hobbyist fish. The only way a person could get shocked with a GFI and ground probe properly installed is if one of them failed, which isn't what I would call properly installed.
"Were I to remove the ground probe, there would no longer be a current path affecting the fish (they are now the "birds on a wire")."
When someone uses the "birds on a wire" analogy in relation to marine fish it should throw up warning flags that they do not know what they are talking about. Again, the salt water is more conductive than they are. The fish live IN the wire, not on it. Birds live in an insulator, dry air, which is why they don't get shocked without a path to ground.
"In reality, induced voltages and currents will be small... so small that they are probably NOT an issue for the safety of the aquarist"
This is mostly correct. Odds of receiving a fatal shock from a tank is unlikely unless you have a completely failed device and are barefoot on a wet concrete floor or touch a grounded metal light fixture. A painful shock or slight tingle is more likely. The other risk is being hurt by the reaction to the shock such as from yanking your arm back or falling off a step stool.
"they could be unhealthy for the fish and coral (and I suspect they probably are, since sea life has little insulation to mitigate the current flow through their bodies."
They don't need much insulation to mitigate current flow through them since the water around them will protect them from most of the current. It would take a very large voltage (Over 15,oooV) to drive enough current through a marine fish to cause an issue. This doesn't really matter though since it would take so much current flowing around them that the water would boil before the fish was shocked. I would ask this, what is more harmful to a fish, an unmeasurable amount of current flowing through them or a failed electrical device releasing melted plastic and copper into the system? Personally, I want to know if I have a failed component ASAP so I can get it out of my tank, hence the probe with GFCI.
"I can't believe that a continuous current flowing through one's body would not cause havoc with cellular ion transport, not to mention the "jamming" of sensory organs)"
Again, fish won't have any meaningful current flowing through them. Voltage and magnetic fields can impact their sensory organs though. I haven't seen a conclusive study on it but there is reason to believe that stray voltages can cause HLLE in fish because of the sensitivity of the lateral line. If this is true, then a ground probe is the best way to remove those voltages and would make running a ground probe healthier for the fish than not having one.