This is a complicated question, and then again, it is not...
The easy answer is that alk near 7.0 works for all tanks.
The complicated answer is that residual levels on a test kit do not tell you anything about what the corals are actually getting. I have low residual levels of about .1-.2 N (need ICP to detect) and .005-.01 P (1-3 ppb on Hannah Ultra low), but I feed a ton, have lots of ammonia/ammonium and all kinds of phosphate/phosphorous/inorganic/organic/etc that corals can use (photos in my re-build thread). Availability is the prize over residual levels which are fools gold in most cases. Do you feed a lot? If you do feed a lot, then your tank is far from ULN, even if you export a lot too... it is just a natural type of tank that needs no label. To me, you need to be driving AVAILABLE and RESIDUAL building blocks below natural levels with media or chemicals to truly be ULN - I have not really seen anybody do this for quite some time since it does not usually work out well. Zeo, and a few other methods, are coined as ULN, but they are far from it with TONs of available building blocks and people parroting the UNL monicker without digging deeper.
You only really need to worry about burnt tips if available amounts of N and P are so low that you limit organic tissue creation. This is a problem because with low residual levels of N and P really makes calcification hum/fast and the skeleton can outgrow the tissue and push right through the tissue. High availability of N and P can keep the tissue growing regardless of residual levels. This is why cutting back on feedings is never a good idea.
If you want to simplify, keep feeding a good amount, let the residuals stay where they may (find a level that you like and works) and keep the alk at 7.0.