Redfield ratio ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ash321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users None
I have a reactor that is running rowaphos (or similar) would that work to empty and add sulphur into that?

I'd just stop using the Rowophos for a while while starting the NOPOX and see how the phosphate changes. :)

Don't be misled by discussion of the redfield ratio. Dosing organic carbon consumes way more nitrate than phosphate, and the Redfield ratio doesn't really pertain when denitrification is involved. :)
 
Bulk reef supply just talked about the redfield ratio in their latest ulm video.

Are the high nitrates causing issues? Could this just be a small cycle after setting the tank up? Maybe a good water change could reduce levels to acceptable ranges.

How much biological media do you have? You may need more be able to fully complete the nitrogen cycle.

Yes they did. I'd suggest ignoring that discussion. It didn't add anything useful to the discussion of why they might want to add nitrate when it is undetectably low. :(
 
Excellent thanks for all the help everyone il stop the phos reactor and keep with nopox dosing and hopefully it will work! Will keep you all updated
 
Excellent thanks for all the help everyone il stop the phos reactor and keep with nopox dosing and hopefully it will work! Will keep you all updated
 
Excellent thanks for all the help everyone il stop the phos reactor and keep with nopox dosing and hopefully it will work! Will keep you all updated
 
I would also cease the carbon dosing – at least for now — for the same wait-and-see reason. P-limitation, not carbon limitation is all that's going on. ;) So solving your P-limitation is all you may need in order to "fix" things.
 
If you are at .03 in your tank water, then the sand and rocks probably have quite a bit bound up that will get released as the water column concentration gets lower. There can be quite a reservoir there for Phosphate.
 
Yes they did. I'd suggest ignoring that discussion. It didn't add anything useful to the discussion of why they might want to add nitrate when it is undetectably low. :(

What I got was that dosing nitrates can help, but we don't know exactly why. Then they proceeded to add that carbon plays a major role, but we can't test for that yet so carbon dosing is also all anecdotal right now.
 
Did anyone mention making a Donovan's Nitrate Destroyer? Look in the DIY forum section, it took mine 6 weeks to kick in after seeding, but when it did my nitrates now stay consistently at 10ppm.
 
What I got was that dosing nitrates can help, but we don't know exactly why. Then they proceeded to add that carbon plays a major role, but we can't test for that yet so carbon dosing is also all anecdotal right now.

The why is that photosynthetic organisms need a source of nitrogen, and nitrate is an easy one to add. Why would it decrease a problem (say, dinos or maybe cyano? )perhaps due to driving something else to grow that then outcompetes the problem for something else, such as iron).

The carbon dosing discussion I saw in relation to the Redfield ratio was unusual, since photosynthetic organisms (including corals) are often a source of DOC, and they are using inorganic carbon (carbon dioxide) for photosynthesis to make DOC compounds. A bleached coral can benefit from DOC, but to think there's a DOC need by corals that relates to the Redfield ratio is just not supported by the scientific literature.
 
Last edited:
So i have high nitrates between 50-60ppm seems to be going up not down. My phos is right around 0.03.

I have been recommened to use nopox so i dosed my first dose yesterday.

Now this is my issue all the research i have done indicates that if you have low phosphate the nopox will not work.

Due to something called the redfield ratio. Anyone know if this is the case or not?

My No3 was 30 ppm and my phos 0,02. I used a bottle of nopox and after 2 months my No3 is still around 30 and my phos 0,02

I think a good ideia is to do water changes to reach No3 around 10 ppm and them start again with Nopox

Best Regards
 
I have deiceded to follow randys advice removed the phos reactor and added more nopox so we will se if it comes down. Water changes dont even touch the nitrate in my tank atm.
 
So would i benefit from turning my phos reactor off or just see where nopox naturally takes the nitrate (if anywhere) ?
Rowa is pretty potent stuff, I wouldn't shut it down completely. Just cut it down to like a quarter or half of what you usually add.

Through all this, just stay along the lines of not making big big changes and you should be fine.
 
I m
I reffered to the redfield ratio more to illustrate my issue of having low phos and high nitrate. In regards to carbon dosing.

Currently phos reactor is out of the tank and just dosing 8ml of nopox per day. So will monitor the nitrate over the next few weeks. Will be moving to vinegar or vodka though as its way cheaper than nopox!
 
I m

I reffered to the redfield ratio more to illustrate my issue of having low phos and high nitrate. In regards to carbon dosing.

Currently phos reactor is out of the tank and just dosing 8ml of nopox per day. So will monitor the nitrate over the next few weeks. Will be moving to vinegar or vodka though as its way cheaper than nopox!
Depending on which carbon source you use you will find out different results.
Means certain bacteria strains like certain carbon sources more and some less.
That will determine your achieved No3 and Po4 levels.
You can use a lot of variety of carbs such as Vodka (Potato is the best, not grain Vodka!), Sugar, Vinegar, Coke, Molasse etc.
Pro's and Con's on all of them and results differ from skimmer foam density and skimmer operation, hence different from system to system.
A real good mix with least issues I personally achieved when I simply used the Zeostart product as a carbon source. Maybe you want to give that a try ;-)
 
Depending on which carbon source you use you will find out different results.
Means certain bacteria strains like certain carbon sources more and some less.
That will determine your achieved No3 and Po4 levels.
)

Is there any reef tank evidence that selecting different carbon sources results in differential consumption of N and P?

You can use a lot of variety of carbs such as Vodka (Potato is the best, not grain Vodka!), Sugar, Vinegar, Coke, Molasse etc.

What's the rationale behind thinking grain vodka is undesirable?
 
Is there any reef tank evidence that selecting different carbon sources results in differential consumption of N and P?



What's the rationale behind thinking grain vodka is undesirable?

Hi Randy,
well, most proof of this is out of theories and experience and testing originated from medical researches. I spent quite some time on this subject when trying to find good carbon sources for marine bacteria. The medical research provides a lot of information about bacterial growth behavior and fueling sources.
We all know that good or bad bacteria acting similar to supplementing of carb sources. They grow! It's also known, that for whatever reason, Cyano bacteria strains populate much better by using Vodka than probiotic bacteria strains.
It's not a secret that white bacteria grow much better by supplementing more white sugar as ingredient of the carb source. Vinegar seems to be the better solution for the potential problem of overpopulating white bacteria and cyano to keep them in check. Amino acids (don't ask me which ones plz ) have a very positive influence on pathogenic bacteria growth as well on others!

So the message of the above is that apparently, depending on the sort of carb source, the individual bacteria types are been grown better then others by a certain carb source. So finding the right mix of carbs, of course heavily depending on the existing bacteria types and associated population will trigger the results of the bacteria biology in the tank after supplementing the carb source.

Certain bacteria prefer apparently different Nutrients, hence depending what strain you overpopulate via carb dosing, will results in either lower No3 or lower Po4, they do consume both but in significant different ratios. Hence you can end up with superlow nitrates or low phosphates at the end. Remember the term monoculture in the early days of the hobby. I personally use RI N/P reducing pellets for some time now and the effect on nitrate consumption is huge while Po4 is always insufficiently reduced, I just have to live with that fact by using this media as a carb source.
Pure Vodka, sugar mix takes care much better of Po4, but fuels too much Cyano strains. Message is that the carb source is having influence on the nutrient consumption ratio.
Then you have also all sorts of other bacteria that do not survive very long in marine environment in high populations, but clean your tank pretty quick until being outcompeted and starved, such as the bacteria used in some Dr.Tims and Vibrant etc.
But this is a different story.

Vodka !!!
Vodka is used as a carb source since decades now and came originally from the guys over in Europe such as Netherlands, Germany and East European countries.
Very successful story so far years back, was a milestone in the Aquarium hobby to use Vodka, VSV and some other crazy mixes. I think it made it's way over to the US through the U.K reefing community.
Anyways, Grain Vodka is actually not real traditional Vodka.
Grain Vodka is called "Korn" or "Schnaps" in Europe and we would not use that for carb supplement. The traditional Vodka is made from Potatoes hence the ugly taste. When I bought my first Vodka here in the US to mix it in the tank I was surprised about the taste and started to realize this isn't real Vodka.
Well, long story short, it works to some extend but caused more Cyano issues, hence I used real Potato Vodka after I found it in stores. Gave better results but still Cyano issues on the long run even with different ratios mixed with Sugar and vinegars.

The best and easiest results as a carbon source I had with Pohl's Zeostart.
Pohl never revealed his ingredients in this concentrated product.
But would love to know what's in it!!!
 
This is totally anecdotal, but it seemed like sugar kept the N in my old FOWLR down better than vodka did. It is also cheaper, pure and easier to dose, IMO.
 
This is totally anecdotal, but it seemed like sugar kept the N in my old FOWLR down better than vodka did. It is also cheaper, pure and easier to dose, IMO.
Likely the case!
The issue with high sugar is that it thrives the white bacteria.
Overpopulation (too much) of white bacteria you can see when you have a white film on the water surface in low flow areas of the tank (typically corners) and quite sump chambers. As well as worse case whitish/milky colored water, but that applies to many bacteria type blooms.

A friend always tried to talk me into the use of corn starch as a carbohydrate additive as part of the VSV mix I used in the old days.
There are many forms of sugars. Even a mix of cane sugar and grape sugar does the job but did not used as a single additive, always a mix.
Google carbohydrate and see what Wiki has to say about all the forms of carbs and where they can be found ;-)
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top