I didn't get to know where the rocks came from, that went into the non feed tank. age/check that's really good length of time agreed with animals that actively feed to, finding sustenance
where did the rocks come from that went originally into the non feed tank, before the move
if they came from a reef tank, then the outcome is: that tank is able to stave off total starvation demise really well so far. it would make 100% sense how the tank is going: live rock carries that much sustenance during fallow times. it is the largest version of one of those sealed ecosystem eggs where the opulae shrimp inside simply had no other option, a place they never adapted to. but its lasting longer than I would have bet for sure, that part is neat to hear of.
and if they were dry rocks, bottle bac cycled, and no solid food ever was put into that tank and no live rock/surfaces other than the actual skeletons of the corals inserted, no seawater use, then I'm still on a hunt for the revealing clues as there's no precedent for that in reefing so its a fascinating description of the setup
*hey would you post closeup pics of the sandbed and rocks, curious how much coralline/benthic growth markers are on the rocks/algae pockets just the normal stuff. it's neat to be able to see how live rock ages in restricted systems vs fed ones. that's helpful to see can you post updated phone pics from today that are closer up/just a few?
thank you for responding. I remember a time nobody believed a fishbowl reef wasn't a photoshop it is nice to hear the age details of the system, 6+ years is serious age proof it is.