Show me your Favias!

First of all, there is no such thing as a bowerbanki acan or a bowerbanki Favia. Bowerbanki is a species of coral from the genus Homophyllia.

Second of all, you shouldn’t always trust seller/import IDs as they get things wrong all the time. Third of all, bowerbankis have larger (max 20mm) and more irregular corallites while acans have smaller (max 10mm) and more circular corallites, like your coral.
Yeah, that's why in my original post I said acan/homophyllia bowerbanki - some people don't keep up with the reclassification and so i mentioned both in case ... Kind of like "acan lords" vs Micromussa.

Best and most conclusive way for coral is looking at the skeleton
 
20230218_125051.jpg

Here is a dirt cheap freebie I picked up. It seems to like the spot
 
We all go by common names in the hobby like euphyllia and acan lords. It’s good that the new taxonomy is pointed out. Eventually it will stick;)
Yes, I know. And I often correct people when they call frogspawn euphyllia... But it's not necessary to get all man-splainy every single time, when sometimes all someone is looking for is how to care for the coral ;)
 
Last edited:
Yeah, that's why in my original post I said acan/homophyllia bowerbanki - some people don't keep up with the reclassification and so i mentioned both in case ... Kind of like "acan lords" vs Micromussa.

Best and most conclusive way for coral is looking at the skeleton
Skeletal analysis is not necessarily the best way to classify/identify corals, as doing so can leave out potentially important details such as how the flesh/mantles/tentacles look, locality, or spawning behavior. Using skeletal analysis is how we got Acanthastrea pachysepta classified as Lobophyllia, frogspawns and hammers classified as Euphyllia, and various unrelated corals classified in the family Faviidae. There are also a few instances where two coral species have nearly identical skeletons but have other characteristics that separate them. One example of this is hammers and frogspawns, which have basically identical skeletons and were once classified as a single species (Euphyllia fimbriata), but have separate, distinct tentacle morphologies. Another example is Coelastrea aspera and C. incrustans, which also have identical skeletons, but differ in spawning behavior and times. The best way to identify/classify corals is through genetic/molecular analysis, as it is much less susceptible to mistakes due to convergent evolution or not looking at all characteristics, and better at finding cryptic species.
 
Skeletal analysis is not necessarily the best way to classify/identify corals, as doing so can leave out potentially important details such as how the flesh/mantles/tentacles look, locality, or spawning behavior. Using skeletal analysis is how we got Acanthastrea pachysepta classified as Lobophyllia, frogspawns and hammers classified as Euphyllia, and various unrelated corals classified in the family Faviidae. There are also a few instances where two coral species have nearly identical skeletons but have other characteristics that separate them. One example of this is hammers and frogspawns, which have basically identical skeletons and were once classified as a single species (Euphyllia fimbriata), but have separate, distinct tentacle morphologies. Another example is Coelastrea aspera and C. incrustans, which also have identical skeletons, but differ in spawning behavior and times. The best way to identify/classify corals is through genetic/molecular analysis, as it is much less susceptible to mistakes due to convergent evolution or not looking at all characteristics, and better at finding cryptic species.
All good points. Seeing as genetic or molecular anaylsis is out of the reach of most hobbyists, I thought skeleton morphology would be a safe bet to mention (esp for Acropora) but...in any event, I hope we haven't beat a dead horse too much here. If you have any "favia"/etc to show we'd love to see! Thanks for the information :)
 
Yes, I know. And I often correct people when they call frogspawn euphyllia... But it's not necessary to get all man-splainy every single time, when sometimes all someone is looking for is how to care for the coral ;)
Agreed. The man-splaining is a bit tedious.
 
First of all, there is no such thing as a bowerbanki acan or a bowerbanki Favia. Bowerbanki is a species of coral from the genus Homophyllia.

Second of all, you shouldn’t always trust seller/import IDs as they get things wrong all the time. Third of all, bowerbankis have larger (max 20mm) and more irregular corallites while acans have smaller (max 10mm) and more circular corallites, like your coral.
Im confused now! What do I have then?!
5FB14437-3048-4BE3-A82C-28DFA7E64551.jpeg
659DC4FD-EA87-4207-A2B7-C11173A540C4.jpeg
F1F8E0BF-DC0D-439E-A19F-71022C91F231.jpeg
 
This guy is becoming one of my favorite corals. I believe I bought it as a sour apple Favites. I'm not really sure what is is now that it's grown and has fluffy bits.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5045.jpg
    IMG_5045.jpg
    132.3 KB · Views: 37
Just for perspective on how awesome some of those tanks are above, here's my little guys lol

20230222_134759.jpg


They have tripled in size since frags 9 months ago though! :cool:
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top