I totally agree. To me there are 2 issues -Even if this were the case if the byproduct is an algaecide I think they have to list it. When I heard about this product I thought it was algae eating bacteria (like copepods eat some algae). I was about to buy it on this assumption (safe algae eating bacteria). I would not have bought it if they referenced that it's a bacteria based algaecide (with the same effects as a chemical algaecide). I would pay half the money and buy API's version. Having said that based on the analyses of Vibrant it looks like they only found chemical markers and nothing related to biological markers from bacteria which suggests bacteria is a lie regardless.
1. does the product work?
2 . whats in the product?
I've already posted my experience with it. Despite several 90 percent water changes - the hair algae in my freshwater aquarium never recurred. IDK why? (its a discus tank - and so water changes are more often - but there was a lot of hair algae).
I have come to the conclusion that there are several products that claim to do xxxx without any damage - that in certain tanks do do damage. This is not to excuse or accuse UWC. What is unclear to me is why everyone is so hyped up about vibrant - when many people are buying supplements that have no proven benefit with no questions asked. IMHO - vibrant (whatever is in it) works.



