Water Changes = Blood Letting


The second link is the only one that had any tanks with sps (unless you want to count montipora which ime just another herpe). I'm not trying to debate til the end of the world but very few and far between are the "nice successful" tanks without any water changes. I put "nice successful" in quotes because I was trying to be specific to sps and my standards are high. I think anyone can grow zoas, toadstools, Kenya, or any other herpe without doing water changes but toilets would be the same environment minus the salinity. This does not mean it is a healthy environment for the animals. In all the rc threads randy Holmes interjected why it's not a good idea.

And to argue what's stated above that newer tanks have more problems....I see the best progress in a lot of newer tanks with optimal conditions versus old tank syndrome.

I will continue the bi weekly water change routine because the cost of my animals and there health far outways a box of reef crystals.
 
A sneak vieuw 8y wo waterchanges

uploadfromtaptalk1388260870261.jpg
 
Last edited:
With bloodletting new clean blood wasn't put back into the body.

In our tanks, elements (( major, minor, and trace )) are used up -- they need to be replaced, dosing and water changes accomplish this, and (( to a degree )) can be measured --- Cal, Alk, and Mag tests --- to see the difference. Pretty easy to explain, and that isn't even touching on the removal of DOCs, heavy metals and the like that water changes also accomplish.

Dont care to read the rest of this thread since the first person to respond said it well!!!! :horse:
 
Dont care to read the rest of this thread since the first person to respond said it well!!!! :horse:
Not all Tap Water is created equal. Even AZDESERTRAT will say you can run tap water in a reef, its not advisable, but you can do it.
 
Not all Tap Water is created equal. Even AZDESERTRAT will say you can run tap water in a reef, its not advisable, but you can do it.

"Not advisable" should give you a hint.

Even with RO/DI i have had multiple SPS meltdowns in the past due to chloramines, etc....Every meltdown i have had (2 in the last 5 years) have been attributed to make up water. Non measurable by TDS BTW. So imagine tap water.

Do as you feel. :)
 
Last edited:
It's horribly unscientific yet we just don't really know any better.

It's actually pretty scientific. I know you mentioned that you still do them, but your right, there are many thriving tanks that don't do them so you can go down that road if you want. They just do all the stuff manually that a water change does (ie replacing trace elements), and they virtually all have algae scrubbers.
 
In time the hobby evolves
Things which weren't accepted get accepted.
The minority becomes mainstream.
It's all about innovations that makes our hobby more pleasant.

In holland reefing without WC is now mainstream, because we are always looking for and ecological way to lower our footprint an save on expenses
The result are just fine and more and more reefers are being succesfull and enjoying this hobby.

This is another tank without waterchanges
The EZ550reef started in 2015 and since than no WC.
05844c4fdee97247b939a06bcb9fbc5a.jpg
db727e2366be7afa76357f48efed1373.jpg
0daf9ec8beec189f47db519384a3ae93.jpg
15492c6e6e96fed1473b7dbaebd93735.jpg
 
Last edited:
Zero water changes on a 5-15 year old tank is a much different method than broadly subscribing to zero water changes.

I would be curious to see how many of these long-established reef tanks required zero water changes in their infancy. I would also be curious to know how many of these hobbyists would do a water change if animals started to die and they didn't know why. Why is the proactive approach worse than the reactive one?.

No person can possibly know every element that is becoming concentrated or depleted, including desirable and undesirable ones. A water change continues (and will continue) to be the easiest way to replenish the good stuff and dilute the bad.

Even the Triton method, which completes ICP testing, tracking, and supplementation for 30 or so minor, major, and trace elements can require water changes.

I would love to not do any water changes on my tank. It's cheap insurance though. I think you've got it completely backwards. We don't do water changes because we don't know any better. We do them because we do know better.
 
Zero water changes on a 5-15 year old tank is a much different method than broadly subscribing to zero water changes.

I would be curious to see how many of these long-established reef tanks required zero water changes in their infancy. I would also be curious to know how many of these hobbyists would do a water change if animals started to die and they didn't know why. Why is the proactive approach worse than the reactive one?.

No person can possibly know every element that is becoming concentrated or depleted, including desirable and undesirable ones. A water change continues (and will continue) to be the easiest way to replenish the good stuff and dilute the bad.

Even the Triton method, which completes ICP testing, tracking, and supplementation for 30 or so minor, major, and trace elements can require water changes.

I would love to not do any water changes on my tank. It's cheap insurance though. I think you've got it completely backwards. We don't do water changes because we don't know any better. We do them because we do know better.

We assume it's better.
We can agree to disagree.
At least now we have the choice to do the way we think fits our way of reefing best.

It's not a singularity. A great part off the dutch reefing community go without waterchanges. It's about how well you manage to use the tools given.

It's not theory, fancy tools or fancy setups that make a reeftank flourish, it's about how you go about to get long lasting results.
In the end result is the best proof of concept.


Read into the matter before judging:
 
Last edited:
Many publications proof something though

June 26, 2013
Publication on Advanced Aquarist.
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/blog/glennfs-1500-liter-reef-using-hisdsr-method

Advanced Aquarist publication
February 27, 2017
https://www.advancedaquarist.com/blog/glenn-fongs-peninsula-style-reef-tank-is-otherworldly

Featuring on Reefhobbyist, Q1 2024: http://www.reefhobbyistmagazine.com/magazine-tiled-q1-2014-41.html

Featuring on Reef Hobbyist Magazine, Q2 2019.
German visitor: http://www.riffnews.de/ontour-glenn-fong-dsr-dutch-synthetic-reefing/

German visitor + 8Months:
Google "glennfdsr"
You will find plenty material to read about

Google "ez550reef" to see progress and development of one of the many tanks running without WC.
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top