Just to help out I’ve quoted some of your posts.
You seem very attached to your opinion of what something is worth. when a manufacturer doesn’t price in accordance with your expectations you call it price gouging and when people buy something you don’t think is worth it you call them sheeple.
I use Tunze pumps now because I love how the SeaSweeps work and the pumps are amazingly reliable. That said, my MPs were worth every penny. They were amazing pumps. If I pay extra because I like the low profile appearance I’m not a fool. I’m paying for products that satisfy my priorities. If you have different priorities, buy something else.
When you present your argument as a case if you knowing better than everyone, you’re being unfair to all sorts of people.
Are some products failing to live up to expectations? Sure. I know several and I’ve voiced my option on those. If that’s what you intended to say, what came across was much harsher and more judgmental of the participants all around.
That is exactly what I was saying. I clarified this a few times over the thread that the title wasn't the best choice of words. If you notice I happen to post a lot in the middle of the night (when I can't sleep). So choice of words aren't always the best, but I felt it at least got the point across. It wasn't what I felt the product was worth, it was what's the quality of the product that's making it worth that with a bunch of issues?
I don't understand how anything could come across as judgemental when I wasn't criticizing anyone's choice, but a general theme of rising prices and lower quality across the industry, using Ecotech as a single example. I was just saying that people should basically be more aware of what shortcomings are associated with a lot of "premium" products, that I have admittedly bought myself, and not continue to support those products (not brands). If I bought the exact products I was referring to, how is that being judgemental of anyone's choice?
Maybe the context came across wrong? I don't know. The sheeple thing was because it seems this industry has become indoctrinated that certain brands (not individual products) will give the best experience, regardless of things to the contrary.
If anything I said came across as judgemental, that wasn't the intention.
I'll use Sony as an example. Sony has always charged high prices for their tv's. They used to be a premium brand, but for decades still commanded a premium price with little, to no innovation, and often implementing features years after the competition. Only up until recently has Sony went back to being a premium tv manufacturer, but all along Sony was charging high prices and a lot of people would buy the inferior tv because it was from Sony. Thinking that because Sony made it that it was top notch.
That's what I was trying to convey. That just because a certain company makes something doesn't mean it's worthy of its asking price if there are better functioning products of the same class available that will suit your needs. For people to be aware of this. Because not everybody researches everything.
My bad if it came across not how it was intended.