I'd say that if a fish or coral makes it all the way through my qt process of multiple weeks and the parasite/pest manages to still get into the display, then there's no way I can blame anything but bad luck! A QT for fish should be at least a month to 8 weeks (depending on who you talk to) and coral should be a few weeks at least. I'm thinking that if I did diligent treatment and observation during that time and the pest managed to go undetected (which is a virtual impossibility...but I suppose could miraculously happen), then there's no way I should expect that the vendor would have had any different kind of experience if they qt'd.
This brings me back to my own responsibility to QT everything! If a vendor sells me something defective, then sure they need to make it right on THAT particular piece...but there's no way I can hold them accountable for any pest that enters my dt. That's on me.
This brings me back to my own responsibility to QT everything! If a vendor sells me something defective, then sure they need to make it right on THAT particular piece...but there's no way I can hold them accountable for any pest that enters my dt. That's on me.
op2:
I feel like a lot of progress has been made already. If we can impact just one vendor with this discussion, I think it is worth it. And I'd bet that we have impacted some, so in that sense, this is a victorious thread. Even if we get some vendors to consider changing their protocols, it at least starts to tear down the barriers to change. Because change is hard and uncomfortable. I see it every day in my line of work. "Because that's how we've always done it" isn't an acceptable answer. I cringe at this reply. And I think we've seen some of that here, and I hope our discussions shed some light on why that answer isn't good enough any more.


