I am gonna chime in here on lighting.
First, when running MH, I would tend to go with M80(HQI) ballasts if I could BUT, there are instances where you don't want them. Some bulbs burn whiter on HQI than on magnetic. Also, some bulbs require the pulse to be able to start (this is getting less common but the coralvue 20K don't work well on electronic ballasts) so know your bulbs.
Second, a complicated light setup spread across all genres may seem like the best of all worlds but... Let's use an example system here:
250 watt MH 6500K (best growth hands down)
T5 retrofit 2x24" running actinic/blue plus (best at reducing shadows and adding some pop and lots of color)
LED actinic supplemental bars (great for growth and pop)
Now, you would think "Great! I have all bases covered. I will grow anything" While this might be true, look at the cost of the system up front, the power usage and if you can even use this much power without frying your livestock.
You might say "Steven, I can just turn them down and then they won't use as much electricity and last longer" Really? Are your T5 and MH dimmable? MH, no. T5, yes if you spent a lot of money on them.
The current wisdom is T5/LED hybrid which I am just now testing out and will get back to you with findings but it does make sense that it would work.
I still think that, for the money, right now the best thing is a simple programmable LED setup. You can tune them to your specific needs and aesthetics and the ongoing cost is much lower compared to other forms of lighting.
Also, compare brands and USEFUL features. See if you can find PAR/PUR numbers and at least anecdotal real world spread numbers.
I think you will find your money is best spent on a mid to lower price range lighting system and the rest of the money spent on livestock. There have been many, many proven cases of the longevity and low cost maintenance on these less expensive systems so that saying long term they aren't worth it, isn't a valid argument anymore.
This is my experience and you may know better than I.