Bryopsis Cure: My Battle With Bryopsis Using Fluconazole

Did Fluconazole Kill all of your Bryopsis?

  • Yes

  • No

  • I'm treating my tank with it now.

  • I love Bryopsis and I'm mad that everyone is killing it.


Results are only viewable after voting.
Image1486411757.573575.jpg
Image1486411775.256674.jpg
Image1486411802.796387.jpg
Image1486411829.727780.jpg
Image1486411859.001254.jpg
 
On day 6 with minor change so far. Has anyone else forgotten to turn off their skimmer? I did. Think I should add back a little of the Flucon to compensate?
 
I'm already on day nine of running fluconazole my bryopsis is definitely dying but I'm having a serious problem with the cyano which had already started from using vibrant but got a lot worst as all this algae started dying off already lost a couple of frags...
I need to get rid of it asap what do you guys recommend

Vibrant seems to be doing that for a lot of people's tanks. After my Fluconazole treatment I ran two days of chemiclean to get rid of my cyano. It hasn't come back yet.
 
On day 6 with minor change so far. Has anyone else forgotten to turn off their skimmer? I did. Think I should add back a little of the Flucon to compensate?

I would wait just to see if your bryopsis dies without adding more. Some have still had success while running their skimmer.I'm not saying it would hurt to add more but some people's algae dies using less flucon.
 
Vibrant seems to be doing that for a lot of people's tanks. After my Fluconazole treatment I ran two days of chemiclean to get rid of my cyano. It hasn't come back yet.
+1 Vibrant is the cause of cyano. Had this happen to me as well. Looks like the algae smothered the frags. When fluconazole kills it off and after you do chemiclean they may come back.
Correction (dumb phone)... +1 Vibrant causes the cyanobacteria outbreaks on a good majority of the systems being treated with it.
 
Do you think red slime remover can be used during treatment?

I didn't want to use it at the same time because I was testing Fluconazole alone to see if anything had any adverse reactions. I also figured one treatment at a time was enough.There haven't been enough tests yet to say if the two are safe enough to run at the same time. Twilliard is still in the process of growing some algae to run his tests.
 
Out of curiosity, has anyone left their gfo online during treatment and was the treatment still effective?
 
On day 6 with minor change so far. Has anyone else forgotten to turn off their skimmer? I did. Think I should add back a little of the Flucon to compensate?

I didn't turn off my skimmer, or my UV sterilizer, and my bryo was totally gone in 10 days. I did turn off my media (ChemiPure) reactor for a few days though.
 
My wife understands the scientific stuff and pointed me to a website that had this information:

Figure 57–1 Sites of action of antifungal drugs. Amphotericin B and other polyenes (e.g., nystatin) bind to ergosterol in fungal cell membranes and increase membrane permeability. The imidazoles and triazoles (itraconazole, et al.) inhibit 14-α-sterol demethylase, prevent ergosterol synthesis, and lead to the accumulation of 14-α-methylsterols. The allylamines (e.g., naftifine and terbinafine) inhibit squalene epoxidase and prevent ergosterol synthesis. The echinocandins, such as caspofungin, inhibit the formation of glucans in the fungal cell wall.

image600.jpg


I was explaining to her that some folks have good and fast results others do not. Her thoughts were that if the Fluconazole is either absorbed by the Bryopsis or GHA or something else in the tank, and not enough is available that could lead to slower or less than optimum results. Depending on how severe the outbreak is, the Flucon could be getting used up before it eliminates the algae. For people, it sounds as if there are cases where they load up and do a high dose for a few days and then cut back for the rest of the treatment period. So some people may need additional doses to fully eliminate it.
 
I'm on day 4 here and I'm starting to see signs of bryopsis dying off. I'm debating wether or not to put my skimmer back online. Thoughts?
 
I don't think the light, high par, makes a difference or not. This is at the top of my tank, and it's under six t5s. Day 6[emoji24]
20170205_133549.jpg
 
This is the mess in my fuge. Red macros and some cheato, with a whole lot of HA and who knows what mixed in.
I'm going to cut back to just a few hours a night rather than the current 8 hour schedule.
Skimmer cup, ozone and carbon is off now too.

i-2PD7Hcc.jpg
 
Im starting to doubt how effective this stuff is against Derbasia.

I dosed Fluco early Saturday afternoon after a water change and while I do realize its only been 48 hours, Im noticing now that Im home from work that in some areas the derbasia has grown or become more full. I also feel like in seeing some pictures of other folks who are having a hard time that some of their algae looks more similar to derbasia than to bryopsis.

Im going back and forth on whether I want to start a 2nd dose, especially so early into the first treatment. I took away the filter socks, have my skimmer turned off and also the GFO/Carbon reactor. Im definitely seeing the effects of that as I had to clean my glass today when I usually dont have to do that til Wednesday at the earliest.

Ive read this entire thread and I do know that people have said it takes longer for this to remove derbasia, but the fact the mine has shown signs of health and possibly growth after 48 hours is not encouraging. I feel like all Im doing right now is helping to feed the stuff with all my filtration equipment turned off

That being said, if Im wrong, Ill be the first one doing backflips
 
Im starting to doubt how effective this stuff is against Derbasia.

I dosed Fluco early Saturday afternoon after a water change and while I do realize its only been 48 hours, Im noticing now that Im home from work that in some areas the derbasia has grown or become more full. I also feel like in seeing some pictures of other folks who are having a hard time that some of their algae looks more similar to derbasia than to bryopsis.

Im going back and forth on whether I want to start a 2nd dose, especially so early into the first treatment. I took away the filter socks, have my skimmer turned off and also the GFO/Carbon reactor. Im definitely seeing the effects of that as I had to clean my glass today when I usually dont have to do that til Wednesday at the earliest.

Ive read this entire thread and I do know that people have said it takes longer for this to remove derbasia, but the fact the mine has shown signs of health and possibly growth after 48 hours is not encouraging. I feel like all Im doing right now is helping to feed the stuff with all my filtration equipment turned off

That being said, if Im wrong, Ill be the first one doing backflips

I do apologize as we approach 1400 posts in this thread, and I haven't read them all, but I don't recall a single post stating that fluconazole does anything for derbasia. It's for bryopsis....with some now starting to report some impact on gha....but that's yet to be seen with clear proof. Where did you see this impacting derbasia?


EDIT TO ADD: Derbasia could be GHA. Again, yet to be proven.
 
I do apologize as we approach 1400 posts in this thread, and I haven't read them all, but I don't recall a single post stating that fluconazole does anything for derbasia. It's for bryopsis....with some now starting to report some impact on gha....but that's yet to be seen with clear proof. Where did you see this impacting derbasia?


EDIT TO ADD: Derbasia could be GHA. Again, yet to be proven.

Derbasia is not GHA, its turf algae. Its more similar to bryopsis than it is to GHA. Like Bryopsis, its hard to manually remove, it can survive in low nutrient systems, and also in areas with little to no light.


If youre looking for a post in this thread where it says this stuff can kill Derbesia you can look no further than Page 1, Post 1. Theres also several other posts and pictures where its mentioned throughout the thread. Some pictures looked like derbesia some didnt.

Q: What other nuisance algae's will be killed by Fluconazole?
A: Fluconazole kills the green algae Derbesia also known as GHA. It seems that GHA takes longer to kill than the bryopsis but it still dies. Bubble algae is unknown due to most reefers treating their tanks have been using Vibrant. Vibrant kills bubble algae very well.


Im not trying to sound snarky or anything, its pretty obvious from the results on this thread and others that Fluco kills Bryopsis, Im just pointing out that we may need to pump the brakes on lumping Derbesia or turf algae into the equation as well. Also, i think constantly referring to Derbasia as GHA is a mistake, even if you want to classify Derbasia as a form of GHA, it is SIGNIFICANTLY more difficult to remove than your regular run of the mill GHA. This can lead to some of the confusion when people are saying it works in one case and not the other.

Just one mans opinion
 
Last edited:
Please let me know if I am correct on my calculation of the proper dosage and procedures. I ordered 10 - 200mg tablets of Fluconazole. I have a 45 gallon tank, so by my calculations at 20mg / gal, a 45 gallon tank needs a 900mg single dose. At 200mg per tablet, I will need to dose 4 1/2 tablets. Before dosing I will remove all carbon and turn off skimmer. Then the waiting game begins with no water changes for 12 days.
 
Derbasia is not GHA, its turf algae. Its more similar to bryopsis than it is to GHA. Like Bryopsis, its hard to manually remove, it can survive in low nutrient systems, and also in areas with little to no light.


If youre looking for a post in this thread where it says this stuff can kill Derbesia you can look no further than Page 1, Post 1. Theres also several other posts and pictures where its mentioned throughout the thread. Some pictures looked like derbesia some didnt.

Q: What other nuisance algae's will be killed by Fluconazole?
A: Fluconazole kills the green algae Derbesia also known as GHA. It seems that GHA takes longer to kill than the bryopsis but it still dies. Bubble algae is unknown due to most reefers treating their tanks have been using Vibrant. Vibrant kills bubble algae very well.


Im not trying to sound snarky or anything, its pretty obvious from the results on this thread and others that Fluco kills Bryopsis, Im just pointing out that we may need to pump the brakes on lumping Derbesia or turf algae into the equation as well. Also, i think constantly referring to Derbasia as GHA is a mistake, even if you want to classify Derbasia as a form of GHA, it is SIGNIFICANTLY more difficult to remove than your regular run of the mill GHA. This can lead to some of the confusion when people are saying it works in one case and not the other.

Just one mans opinion


@stevo01 included Derbesia in the FAQs because he had a species of it in his tank that Flucon killed. I believe there are over 20 or more different species of Derbesia. Not all of them are turf like as not all of them are hair like.
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top