This seems like a helpful idea, but I doubt this makes much difference in terms of structure. I could be wrong, as my opinion is based on building structural engineering experience rather than aquarium experience. Is there evidence of these being used structurally, or are those pieces for adding corner rims to mount/retain lids?
The stress on the glass panels and seams is much greater at the middle of the panel for the front panel and estimated approximately 1/3 total depth from the bottom of the tank for the side panels. This is due to a concept called "moment" if you want to research the physics terms. The higher pressure in the middle of the panel is supported by the tension within the glass panel itself as well as tension on the seams of the tank.
Though pressure is equal horizontally across the panel based on water depth, the amount of resistive force is much greater at the corners than in the middle of the panel since the other glass panel is directly pulling back on the glass resisting the pressure. Due to this, rimmed tanks gain a small amount of extra pressure resistance from the perimeter rim, but much more pressure resistance with middle bracing, similar to the effect of eurobracing.
This is why "standard" rimmed aquariums commonly available at popular pet stores always have the cross bracing between the longest panels, typically 1 middle brace for 75g tanks and 2 braces nearly splitting the tank length into thirds. These braces are on both the top and bottom rim.
This is also why rimless tanks need thicker glass than rimmed tanks, since thicker glass has more internal tension resistance which decreases/eliminates the need for other bracing.
Sorry if this is too much during an emergency, look into it on your own time. Also note that I am not claiming to be an expert, but I have at least a little relevant engineering experience, though I doubt my abilities to convey it in a digestible format...