Well they're on to bashing EVs, but anyway, he doesn't understand what PPM is. Hard to have a conversation about global warming if you can't understand simple concepts like PPM, or why you get a different answer from a 60 year old scientist and a 30 year old scientists when you ask them about climate change 'within their lifetime'.
I'm in medicine. In order to complete my PhD, I had to complete a valid scientific research study. The data and information collection put me in a place that gave me insight to research medicine and how hard it is. Not only that, but how lowly paid they are as well. Most of these research scientist are paid with only the proper reference listed in the book or journal. Every time I hear someone say "follow the money" regarding research and science, I know immediately, they have no real knowledge of either. Now, pharmaceuticals, thats who nother ball o wax.
Yes you are very correct about big pharma but there certainly may be ulterior motives when discussing climate change and the key motive is Money along with complete government control.
Definitely. I keep reading about "new battery technology", but even if there is any kind of breakthrough in non-lithium technology it's still at least 10 years away from any practical application.
Ha ha …yeah I won’t be boarding a “Electric airplane” no time soon either
You definitely can't drive EVs the same way as gas/diesel - especially in winter. Two of the biggest sinks in winter are the heater and defroster (other than the cold sapping away at the battery). Strangely enough, the AC in my i4 is actually very efficient and doesn't place much of a drain on the battery.
You can't really draw comparisons between Scandanavia and North America (outside of the cold). Unless you've lived in some of the really remote parts (Alaska, Northern Canada) you honestly can't appreciate the lack of infrastructure (and I'm talking about things like roads - not EV chargers).Expected % sail in Sweden of EV in 2023 - around 35 % of the new car market will be EV...... And we are a cold country.... See chart for the real numbers in new car market - first quarter of 2023
El = EV,Bensin = gasolin. Elhybrid -=not chargeable hybrid. Laddhybrid = charbeable hybrid
Sincerely Lasse
This is what have happens during my lifetime - 1950 - 310 ppm CO2; 2023 420 ppm CO2. If you want to see a table for CO2, CH4 and N2O concentrations in the air from 1750 to 2018 - please see here
I'm pretty sure remote areas of Scandinavia can be just as lacking as northern America. (no offense to either countries)
Excuse me sir. My flying cars use gasoline and diesel! None of that fancy schmancy electricity!
Population of Sweden (2021): 10.42 million
Not sure of that. Here is an Swedish article (Swedish - but Google translate can help). One of the findings is that EV lose around 1/3 of the range ift it is -20 degree C outside.
and.......?
That is better than I thought, but I also do see the value in the ease of use of gasoline vehicles in remote areas. And since most pollution comes from bigger cities where EVs can thrive, I think it's all right to have the adoption of EVs be slower in remote areas.Not sure of that. Here is an Swedish article (Swedish - but Google translate can help). One of the findings is that EV lose around 1/3 of the range ift it is -20 degree C outside.
Here is a test. the test is done in this way described of the test leader (translation Google) All degrees in C. Grader = degrees; räckvidd= range
and.......?
Sincerely Lasse
... And it's far easier to build out EV infrastructure in Scandanavia. I'm simply trying to get across that any logistical challenges in Europe pail in comparison to North America.
