Is it ok to use amoxicillan instead cipro when making a long term dip for my torch corals. I'm afraid to use in my main system. I'm going to dip them for few hours to see if they improve.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know plenty of people who nearly died to flesh eating bacteria. They get a drip line.That's still not how antibiotics work. Such a short exposure will not effectively kill enough bacteria... That's why they're prescribed to humans for 7-10 days or more.
And if we keep dumping this stuff in our tanks with no idea how they work, in 20 years they'll just get a coffin.I know plenty of people who nearly died to flesh eating bacteria. They get a drip line.
To prevent infection, they get a tablet.
Coral dips can go from 15 minutes to 8 hours. Again, depends on the severity.
Sometimes its best to pull the infected for isolated treatment, especially if needed long term. Whole tank treatments work too.
But, this doesnt rule out a bucket with heater and an aerator for longer exposure.
OkAnd if we keep dumping this stuff in our tanks with no idea how they work, in 20 years they'll just get a coffin.
I don't think "but this is the way we've always done it" is a persuasive argument to continue to do something that's wrong.Ok
Do you know how long cipro has been used to treat fish for how many years?
We're already seeing antibiotic resistant bacteria more and more often in hospitals, this isn't a possible issue further down the line, it's a problem that is already appearing today and will only continue to get worse if we continue with the abuse of antibiotics. We've very quickly forgotten how revolutionary antibiotics were to medicine - common and minor infections nowadays may have been life threatening within recent history.If we keep using copper wrong to treat ich, it's going to become a super parasite and wipe out the planet!
We have not always done it this way.I don't think "but this is the way we've always done it" is a persuasive argument to continue to do something that's wrong.
That wasn't me either, I just explained the analogy that another poster gave.We have not always done it this way.
But, I'm also not the one who compared a pain killer to an anti-biotic.
That all you got? We may need to stop using hand sanitizers, bleach and peroxide while we're at it.
We've used bleach and peroxide for generations. We've used alcohol to sanitize for centuries. These molicules wipe colonies of bacteria, parasites, germs out. They can even cook flesh.That wasn't me either, I just explained the analogy that another poster gave.
But yes, just because we've used something in the past doesn't mean we should continue to do so. I can think of plenty of things we've done in this hobby and moved away from when we realised they were harmful, ineffective or cruel, this is just another.
These are completely different treatments that work on bacteria in completely different ways. One of them you can use to treat infections inside of people, another you can't.We've used bleach and peroxide for generations. We've used alcohol to sanitize for centuries. These molicules wipe colonies of bacteria, parasites, germs out. They can even cook flesh.
Whats cipro going to do that they haven't done better?
You really don't think bleach can form a super bacteria? There's a reason they say "kills 99% of germs" I'd be more fearful whats brewing in my kitchen with those anti-germ cleanersThese are completely different treatments that work on bacteria in completely different ways. One of them you can use to treat infections inside of people, another you can't.
Antibiotics generally target specific parts of the cell, like a type of protein that makes up a cell wall.
Alcohol santisers dissolve lipids that make up the cell (from what I understand).
One of these can be avoided with relatively simple mutations, while the other can't. Comparing these things and saying they're both as likely to develop resistances is like saying people are as likely to evolve to outpace predators as they are to evolve to be able to sustain a bullet to the head. They're completely different mechanisms, and only one of them poses a real immediate threat of mutated resistance.
I think it's especially super important to point out in this thread, that in the thread I posted as well as countless many other successful cipro dip threads across the board.That's still not how antibiotics work. Such a short exposure will not effectively kill enough bacteria... That's why they're prescribed to humans for 7-10 days or more.
There's a big difference between the risks and results from those two scenarios. As I explained before it's more like a bacterial evolving to not be susceptible to getting shot in the head. And further, we don't give patients bleach to help them with an infection. Our number of effective antibiotics that humans can safely take to help with a specific infection are likely far more limited than the number of chemicals we can use to wipe down surfaces and disinfect them. A bacteria becoming resistant to bleach is likely many orders of magnitude less likely and less impactful than antibiotic resistance (which we are already seeing today).You really don't think bleach can form a super bacteria? There's a reason they say "kills 99% of germs" I'd be more fearful whats brewing in my kitchen with those anti-germ cleaners
You have actually nailed the the issue well in that comment. Risks of human resistant infection from poultry are real. Those poultry might acquire those bugs from somewhere and they could be generated by any blanket use of such drugs.I see it now, headline news.
Man gets super strain of salmonella from his chicken for dipping his coral in cipro.

