- Joined
- Aug 13, 2019
- Messages
- 2,088
- Reaction score
- 2,772
I agree except for the customer service claim. Most of the original owner, within warranty period (even a couple years over in a few cases) that have been posted on here were handled within the realistic conventions of manufactures warranty coverage. Of course no one would be thrilled with just a replacement tank with everything else involved with a leak, but that is the reality of warranty coverage. Older and or second hand tanks that are no longer covered under the original terms of the warranty, well…. Just the reality of manufactures warranty coverage. I feel for everyone that goes through a tank failure, don’t get me wrong. It’s just how the game gets played out. That said, if and when someone proves that the manufacturer willfully and knowingly sold defective products and denied warranty coverage there can be no other expected recourse. I just can’t get behind the horrible customer service claims being posted.Yes, I’m not going to spend thousands of dollars on a product that could possibly do hundreds of thousands of dollars in damage to my home (and others’ homes).
There’s enough evidence out there that suggests the relative risk of owning a RS tank is higher than similar brands, and, even worse, explicit evidence that RS’ support for customers when this happens is woeful.
Last edited:

