You wish you had a hospitality badge! No ones going to think your grumpy Gus if you have a hospitality badge...This x 100
Like the people that post "Welcome!" all day. Those people would give 5 stars to a garden of Dinos.![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You wish you had a hospitality badge! No ones going to think your grumpy Gus if you have a hospitality badge...This x 100
Like the people that post "Welcome!" all day. Those people would give 5 stars to a garden of Dinos.![]()
Hmm, I kind of want to try this. @TheHarold if you want to be nominated please post a photo of your incredible tank and I'll make the recommendation![]()

More than welcome. Seriously.
So the issue is that there are thousands of tank threads made by very knowledgeable members, having a public rating system just turns into a popularity contest. There are some build threads that are by new members that are really popular but it's because the member is well liked and not because of how knowledgeable they are. Threads like that would become highly rated, despite not having the corresponding credibility your system would imply.I'll throw out a wild idea since I somewhat agree the whole Reef Squad / Excellence thing can cause some issues and a cliquish feel to the site. Perhaps the forum should move to a tank rating system where a users tank receives a public star ratings with count. Someone with 100,000 five star votes on their tank for example would be infinitly more meaningful IMO than a Reef Squad banner. Now the public can choose instead of insiders...
So the issue is that there are thousands of tank threads made by very knowledgeable members, having a public rating system just turns into a popularity contest. There are some build threads that are by new members that are really popular but it's because the member is well liked and not because of how knowledgeable they are. Threads like that would become highly rated, despite not having the corresponding credibility your system would imply.
No seriously this is actually really good to know. Didn't know that's how it worked. So instead of complaining I'll just start nominating awesome tanks! Is there a thread for nominations by chance?
So the issue is that there are thousands of tank threads made by very knowledgeable members, having a public rating system just turns into a popularity contest. There are some build threads that are by new members that are really popular but it's because the member is well liked and not because of how knowledgeable they are. Threads like that would become highly rated, despite not having the corresponding credibility your system would imply.
Hmm, I kind of want to try this. @TheHarold if you want to be nominated please post a photo of your incredible tank and I'll make the recommendation![]()

Just pm a squad member, it will get forwarded for review.
Remember, constructive criticism is always better, how do you think R2R could do better?I haven't read all the posts but many so I'll just say it. I think the whole reef squad thing is ridiculous. When I see someone call out reef squad I bail on that thread. I love R2R but not the reef squad. I think we can do better.
Just pm a squad member, it will get forwarded for review.
Democracy is not a bad thing, but people have to understand what they are voting for
Done! Don't worry @TheHarold I left you out given your sig message but you do have incredible tanks!
Thank you, again, for you continued involvement.
Do you feel like your posts were fully understood? Or do you feel like some (perhaps all) of your posts were misconstrued in some way that did not benefit the conversation?
I can message later, need to step back and relax for a bit.
Ironically, it’s a saltwater pool.
![]()
Too funny but yet so true.This x 100
Like the people that post "Welcome!" all day. Those people would give 5 stars to a garden of Dinos.![]()

