Lots of good points. I must defend my recommendations again because the OP hasn’t changed much. A new spectrum going through an appropriate acclimation period and stopping nopox. I stopped nopox cold turkey because things couldn’t get much worse, and everything got better in a matter of weeks. I agree with the philosophy of not doing/changing too much when things are doing good and nutrients are too low but this wasn’t the case for the OP and their recipe was unknowingly killing the sps. This needed to be stopped immediately to give them a chance to survive. Unfortunately this wasn’t able to save them, but weening off wouldn’t of helped either. I totally agree that the OP needs more fish and to stop chasing numbers. There are plenty of thriving sps examples in r2r that don’t ever worry about no3 or po4. The corals tell them when they need to investigate. Keep it simple.
Hello,
I see your point but it’s severely flawed and not sound advise. Your basing the results off of your tank, and noprox doesn’t work like that. Unless the op completely changes everything including rock and sand they can risk a symptom withdrawal from the noprox. There are some things you can stop cold turkey this isn’t one of them. There are far more severe actions that can take place by doing such.
By reading this thread not a single person has been able to determine exactly what initially started it. We can say lights, or nutrients or others or noprox. But even based on your results may not work on his tank. Another example is penicillin works for must people until it doesn’t or they are allergic.
In the case with your tank, it worked for you and it proved effective. Now, with that said, how many times have you recreated this problem and recovered it by your solution? Would it work the same or have the same effects, or similar effects or no effect? When you say tried and trued, to what extent?.
We all have read others mistakes and what not to do, etc but if you notice lol including myself, we seem more capable of fixing others tanks before our own. There are new things I learn everyday (like most of us do) that I have to be embarrassed because I didn’t know and should have known.
I’m not saying your ideas are not valid, but if one doses medication, which technically noprox is, it works the same as some addictive medications and has withdrawn like symptoms (which they Red Sea clearly states as a warnings). Which hopefully they have tested this in the lab on several test tanks and corals etc.
If you have done the lab work or the experiments to back up what you suggest as a true method I’d love to read it. I for one would love something that I know will not kill my sps or make it grow and have color etc. As I’m aware here is no such true method. What works for me hasn’t worked for others, and you should see some of the responses I get because of the lights I use. But, they grow coral like crazy and they have amazing colors but it’s also combination of items and stable parameters. This method may work for him it may not doubting, but he needs to be made aware of the consequences if he does a cold turkey stop.
I have seen my lfs run an sps dominant tank, and it is amazing. It has 40 plus ppm nitrates and phosphates are high as well. But somehow it works, and it’s worked for 20 years for him. When I set my tank up I was use to 2-5 ppm nitrates and very low phosphates. Alk was 8 average and cal was 440 average. No dips etc swings etc, then I decided to raise both nitrates and phosphates. Within about a week, (prior I was doing 75 gallon water changes and skimming pretty heavy). Let it slowly build and kept it there and I lost three huge sps colones within a day to rtn. Then to remedy this I had to use noprox to drop it steadily but faster. Within three days I lost three more newer smaller colonies. Then as the nitrates dropped things stabalized.
Now two things for this little set back, first, tank grown sps and (they were more expensive show pieces etc) handles the swings much better than the sps colonies grown in the ocean . They literally within a day lost all hope, and I had to bury them.
The second thing is my tank became addicted and but worse was use to my ecosystem of 2-5ppm and the first color on phosphates. This is what’s being missed his tank is already a different ecosystem than yours. The climate here in Idaho is far different than in Africa. Yes humans survive but we adapt to the nature around us. We need to know what his tank started out as a month or two before the loss of corals. The best remedy is going back to what that ecosystem knows, and not that yours isn’t great, but yours is in North America for example and his is in the Middle East.
If the op has logged this information it would be very handy to know and see where his parameters were, lights and routines were. To back my theory up on this, it’s how we found the aides virus and the Ebola virus etc. buy taking samples of those before onset and then cross matched with other disease aka hepatis b virus, and were able to link it to the retrovirus family. (Yes probably for to complex) but people forget corals are living animals micro (lol and simple) but none the less can adaptive to systems.
Feeding reef roids is another good way, marine snow and I don’t suggest turning the lights up if his corals are sick. Most animals or even people usually seek shelter from the sun, turning the lights on may further damage other corals if his system is not balanced.
It would be interesting to see and find what the initially cause was (definitive) not based on hypothesis. Corals have many forms of behavior we have not learned yet. Something I hope that comes available is a test where people can check the amount of food that is in the water. I’m not speaking in terms of alk or cal, but actually food. There is such a broad scope that systems can survive on, which supports what I have stated. Which is corals adapt to their environment, and each tank is different. Changing these are trying to mimic others can either fix or destroy an ecosystem.
I have had extreme experience working with lab tanks and working with smaller local aquarium tanks. I have also done my tank which is 240 gallons and worked with tanks that are over 5,000 gallons. In terms they were all very different especially since we had to run different systems etc. for those running identical systems if one failed 99% they all failed. But would be interesting to see how this turns out and if he had that information.
Sincerely
Sarah