We are our brothers keepers

  • Thread starter Thread starter mnat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users None
I read the whole thread before it was deleted and sexy corals sold a coral under another name to shrimplet. Shrimplet did nothing wrong by selling his frag even though sexy corals told him never to show it or sell it to any one wonder why he said that?? It is obvious the thread got deleted to protect sexy corals name just as my post here will proberly be deleted too to protect the donations from sexy corals
 
Nothing in this thread has been deleted yet. If you're referring to the previous thread that was deleted you can read my explanation above.
 
Yes even is apologized for my wrong information.

I think in this case I would trust the reefer who has an expansive collection of high end corals vs the person trying to make money off of someone and those who might have a tiny but of bias showing.
 
That was my mistake I guess so many people put a post at the same time I thought mine got deleted sorry for that mistake
 
Yea steer clear of conspiracy theories because there is none here.
 
I do not believe someone just deleted the thread by accident come on seriously and it just so happens to be a thread that made one of the top vendors look bad
 
Who would pay 1200 an eye now from this vendor if your not even sure your going to get what you paid for?
 
Let's keep it in track. I appreciate the responses but let's keep this from going down the rabbit hole.
 
I read the whole thread before it was deleted and sexy corals sold a coral under another name to shrimplet. Shrimplet did nothing wrong by selling his frag even though sexy corals told him never to show it or sell it to any one wonder why he said that?? It is obvious the thread got deleted to protect sexy corals name just as my post here will proberly be deleted too to protect the donations from sexy corals
FWIW, there was a lot of finger pointing in yesterday's thread. NOTHING was really proven, beyond the fact the OP did not have the coral he thought he had.

The thread was NOT deleted to protect the interest of any sponsor. It wasn't even clear if a sponsor was or was not in the wrong for that matter.

I do not believe someone just deleted the thread by accident come on seriously and it just so happens to be a thread that made one of the top vendors look bad
Believe it. The mod who did it felt really, really bad about it. If he/she wants to chime in here, great; but I promise everyone it was quite clear it was an honest mistake.
 
I thought when reef raft said to sexy corals that's not my coral and sc admitted selling it to shrimplet as that coral that pretty much cleared it up
 
Not trying to get banned here but that is what was said between vendors before it got deleted
 
I thought when reef raft said to sexy corals that's not my coral and sc admitted selling it to shrimplet as that coral that pretty much cleared it up

I think you are confused on your facts. What you just stated was never said. RR said that it didn't look right in the pic and volunteered to go verify SC's coral. SC said that was fine. SC denied selling the coral to shrimplet. As Hunter said above, there was a lot of finger pointing, but nothing was ever proved on any part bc the thread was deleted before it could be resolved.
 
Last edited:
Great thread Mike glad this topic wasn't swept under the rug I for one take pride in buying and selling og gems and if I were in shrimp let's boots I'd be upset about being duked for a high end coral. With that said I have seen this practice of selling a fake piece by other vendors on here aswell but when brought to there attention the matter at hand was corrected and problem no longer existed. I hope the thread comes back from the archives so people can make there own assumption of the situation. IMO I believe shrimplet was sold a fake piece just like the person who bought the fake Bpc ft from the vendor in question awhile back
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not trying to get banned here but that is what was said between vendors before it got deleted

1. Go look at all the vendor feedback in the feedback forum and see if you see any of our sponsors names. You will.

2. If we were trying to hide something would this thread be here?

3. I am glad you are a member but if you feel we are dishonest maybe you should try another forum.

Thanks.
 
Great thread Mike glad this topic wasn't swept under the rug I for one take pride in buying and selling og gems and if I were in shrimp let's boots I'd be upset about being duked for a high end coral. With that said I have seen this practice of selling a fake piece by other vendors on here aswell but when brought to there attention the matter at hand was corrected and problem no longer existed. I hope the thread comes back from the archives so people can make there own assumption of the situation. IMO I believe shrimplet was sold a fake piece just like the person who bought the fake Bpc ft from the vendor in question awhile back

+1. "Shoot I deleted the thread, let me repost it." The issue should be resolved.
 
I thought when reef raft said to sexy corals that's not my coral and sc admitted selling it to shrimplet as that coral that pretty much cleared it up

A little off there

Tony said he did sll the avengers to mike and would come and verify mike still has it

Mike still says shrimplet never purchased the avengers from him and remembers the day he came in when he spent 4k on chalices

So it comes down to who do you believe?

From my understanding neither reef raft USA or Canada even has an avengers anymore
Canada split their colony to come to the us. Half came to tony and tony sold a chunk to mike

Canada sold the rest of their colony to a private individual

And I believe tony lost his colony

So sexy corals does own the avengers. And said he even have a piece to the guy who got the fake

So why again would mike try to rip someone off. He has a colony and a waiting list for people to sell to
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top