I don't participate in any threads without my morality intact. If this bothers you, PM me and maybe we can talk and hash that out.
Or...R2R has a built in Ignore feature....there's no obligation for
any of us to see posts from
any of the members here. Moderators are the only exceptions.
I've supported this thread and solution vs Bryopsis from early on. But I don't cheerlead...not beyond saying I'm glad this treatment works, anyway.
If you can't accept my measured support for this thread, such as it is, then I also invite you to use the Ignore feature.
The treatment works. I was early among those who figured out why. And I even recommend the treatment. But since I don't recommend it freely and without limits, then who cares about any of that, eh?
With this thread at 189 pages – 16 pages (and growing) of which are about green hair algae – I can't specify who cares....but an understandable, working cure is what distinguishes this thread from the other hokey "miracle cure" threads.
Especially in the light of the med we're talking about, I don't see why that has to preclude talking about all the related issues such as appropriate use and prevention.
We are not creating a situation in our tanks that allows bryopsis to just appear.
I think that's in denial of the facts of most of these cases. All the cases I've looked at closely.
I hope you know we're not talking about spontaneous genesis, becuase that's silly. We're talking about making conditions favorable or unfavorable for an algae bloom. Algae blooms generally have a lot in common with each other.
Your position also discounts tanks that repeatedly get frags, algae, live rock, et al from the same sources yet
don't ever come down with bryopsis blooms. And I mean EVER. In some noteworthy cases, not for decades on end....I don't just mean for the first month or three years or something.
If bryopsis was the jason vorhees ;Mask of algae that you seem to be making them out to be, then the ocean would be covered in bryopsis and nothing else. It would outcompete everything it competes with and grow over everything else. But it doesn't. Under normal circumstances the environment keeps it in check. We just need more-normal circumstances!

(And sometimes a different perspective on normal itself.)
Fluconazole works, but our real solution lies in the fact that the ocean (and everyone else's tank) is not completely overrun by bryopsis.
The key is to NOT introduce it into your tank in the first place.
If that was the key, then that makes this a second eradication vs management thread. That is not what you started with, and I'm fairly sure (but could be wrong) is not what you want. It's definitely at least on the verge of unrealistic.
This thread is about an algae bloom with a known medical treatment.
For better or worse, it's a med that's a lot more serious than most treatments we talk about in this hobby. It's on par with antibiotics usage. (Which fluconazole seems to be considered, at least some of the time.)
Before this thread goes any further,I'll say this....This thread is not a gha algae prevention thread and it's also not a mcarrolls ethics thread.
The first part is worth saying, but how many comments have I even made
at all for you to try calling it "my thread".

Let's at least try to remain serious.
26 comments to be exact......out of almost 3800 comments.
I started when someone in the UK observed what a pain it was to acquire fluconazole and I replied with this:
I suspect there are concerns with how much of the stuff is entering the public water/drinking water system. Also concerns with pathogen...
(You, Steve and a number of others hit me with the Like button on that day. My story has not changed.

)
Six or eight posts later, someone else mentioned how fluconazole breaks down easily in the environment or something to that effect. I wasn't the only researcher from this thread on this, but I replied at some point with this:
#1200
Good one! So fluconazole is exceptional in at least one aspect....it practically does not break down at all in the environment.
...
After that post I started to notice more folks posting with caveats, like "it wiped out my acro" or "...my macro algae" or "...I'm treating for the
nth time" so I started to wonder about the poll results (which are still wide open) and whether folks were avoiding the step where they check their basics when anything goes wrong. Sure enough they were.
I also noticed that it was no longer just a coincidence that it "worked" on green hair algae and folks were even using it repeatedly for that.
You may have noticed a change in my posts around that time when I started to post things like:
+1 Not looking to include research in the FAQ, just include some words of caution. (That FAQ may be the only thing some folks read.)
...and...
Maybe throw a few elements of conservatism in there just for good luck. How sure are we about carbon removing the med? What do we know about...
...followed by some posts trying to take some folks to the basics before treatment. (Makes sense to me that this would happen outside the scope of this thread since it's not going to be fluconazole- or even particularly bryopsis-related.)
although you don't seem to have the same issues in the QT threads using the same azole meds,must be selective ethics

)
I have some concerns with both. You may be as surprised as I was to find out that "those azoles" are not "these azoles"....entirely unrelated to each other.
Wonder who was in charge of naming that day??
Thanks a lot, English language!
Also, the disease forum is a whole other topic of discussion, BTW. PM me if you're interested in hearing thoughts on
that.
.You had a problem with where the meds were ending up until I said that they were ending up in the same place after human consumption. (crickets chirping after I said that)
I'm not sure that's an argument in your favor.....and/or you may have missed my answer. In the human waste stream, they end up
80/20 still intact.
Is adding to that human waste stream in a frivolous manner supposed to be a good thing or is it alright if we
keep trying to take this med seriously and
keep promoting fluconazole's use on an as-needed/as-warranted manner? (That always means going back and checking all your basics before treating. Bryopsis is special...even amazing...but not in this way.)