I don't defend them when they have a defect. I say I trust them enough to keep the tank I have in my living room. All I read are a few stories online that I can't verify and can't determine the failure percentage of.Could that be because they have a strong profit margin on Red Sea product?
The thing I can’t wrap my head around is that people pay a crazy amount for these luxury tanks, then they still defend the company when they have a serious defect. Why? The company isn’t doing anything to help people either, other than replacing the tank at cost plus freight. The tank is a fraction of the penalty the user faces in terms of flooring, livestock, drywall replacement, possible insurance premium issues.
For example, if I couldn't buy a car by any manufacturer that has failures documented online, I wouldn't be able to buy a car.
And if I can find 9 failures of a McLaren and 10 failures of a Volkswagen, does that make McLaren more reliable? Or could it be that they sell only a thousand cars per year instead of a million?
Last edited:



